Showing posts with label Orthodox News-Constantinople. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Orthodox News-Constantinople. Show all posts

Monday, November 02, 2009

Uh, since when?

Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Presides Over Ninth Annual Prayer Service for the U.N. Community

As His Holiness visits these shores in his wake news is in the making. We wouldn't have it any other way, would we? And we are not surprised when the rhetoric of

"Unity!

At all costs!!

Now!!!

Forget all our differences in the past-all only a simple misunderstanding, really!!!! "

is in the familiar repertoire of His Holiness.

The press release begins:

"NEW YORK – Last evening, Monday, October 26, His All Holiness, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew presided over the Ninth Annual Orthodox Prayer Service for the United Nations Community"


which alone raises issues which I will not go into here but feel noteworthy to mention nonetheless.

And it just gets better from there:

This Service is sponsored annually by the Joint Commission of the Standing Conference of the Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas (SCOBA) and the Standing Conference of the Oriental Orthodox Churches of America (SCOOCH).


And the press release continues with telling us the who's who at the party and who did what and all the usual niceties.

But I leave the last part, the best one, well, last, to dramatically add effect to this post's title, "Uh, since when?"

His Holiness' own words:

The theological dialogue between our two Christian families – that is the Orthodox Church and the Ancient Oriental Churches, has formally ended the misunderstandings of the past. It is not theology that divides us. Rather, we are united in our commitment to address the pastoral, liturgical and ecclesiastical issues on which we may ever build our unity in Christ more and more. The dialogue must continue, and we must continue to seek opportunities for mutual exchange. As our knowledge grows, our love will grow as well.

Since when was it agreed in a Universal Orthodox Council that this is the case?

It would seem to me that if this be the case, a much more in depth exchange take place between the Orthodox Catholic Church and the Oriental Church to go down the line with each and every Ecumenical Council and get straight with each and every one. Would that not be a logical way to proceed? For that matter, it seems that in the Ecumenical Councils is available the same means to proceed with the Latins and to compare the very different Orthodox Catholic Faith with the Roman Catholic one.

Simple questions between the two such as:

"Does Christ have two natures or one? Two wills or one?" and so forth, hammering it out point by point, determining if indeed we share the same faith.

But to unilaterally make the kind of statement His Holiness makes is reminiscent of the whole change to the Calendar that took place unilaterally through Constantinople in 1923 through dubious-at best- means.

This ought not to be so.

I read somewhere that as we go day by day towards the last day of history, "lawlessness will abound and the love of many will grow cold" but that's not important. The changing of conciliar Church understandings unilaterally is not important and certainly can not qualify for the adjective of "lawless".

Maybe bringing all the other "Orthodox" bodies "into the fold" is a precursor to a greater and easier "unity" then with the Papal Church?

I must just be plain crazy to even be thinking such things.

Go here to read the entire press release.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Ecumentical Patriarchate responds to "A Confession of Faith Against Ecumenism" which garners a response to the response"

From here.

I will reverse the order with this post in which the e-mail is laid out. The e-mail has the response to the Ecumenical Patriarch first and then the text of the Ecumenical Patriarch's letter which garnered the response.
--------------

This is the Ecumenical Patriarch's response to the statement, "A Confession of Faith Against Ecumenism".

OODE Note: The complete text of the letter by the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew to the Archbishop of Athens Hieronymos is as follows:


«Your Beatitude, Archbishop of Athens and All Greece, a beloved and dearest in-Christ brother and co-celebrant of our Mediocrity, Mr. Hieronymos, Chairman of the Holy Synod of the Church of Greece, We greet Your venerable Beatitude as a brother in Christ, addressing you with great pleasure.

A script titled «Confession of Faith» has come to the attention of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, signed by clergymen, monks, as well as certain laypeople, among whom are also certain Metropolitans of the Autocephalous Church of Greece, through which persons the division is being attempted of the Orthodox faithful, into "confessors of the Orthodox faith" , and into something like "lowest bidders" if they do not accept the positions of the said text's composers.

On this matter, and with a synodic opinion, We have been moved to express to You the serious concern of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, and this, for the following reasons:

It is well known that for a long time there exist and are being cultivated - especially in the territory of the Church of Greece - certain zealot trends, which are expressed with sometimes acute and unfamiliar polemics - against the ongoing theological dialogues and contacts of the Orthodox Church and the heterodox. The Orthodox Church has never of course obstructed or censured the expressing of criticism pertaining to the actions and the decisions of the administrative Church, which is why We have also never protested about these trends, even though, as We mentioned, they have often been expressed in an unfamiliar, fanatic and even disrespectful manner. We would not therefore have addressed You, if it were merely a matter of criticism such as that - albeit improper and unfamiliar.

However, the instance of the said «Confession» presents certain peculiarities, which have caused Us concern, given that:

a) This text is self-titled «Confession of Faith» - as though comparable - or at any rate parallel - to those by the Holy and Ecumenical Synods, or to other «Confessions» tht bear the names of persons such as Peter Mogila, Dositheos of Jerusalem, e.a.. But, while the latter also bear a Conciliar validation, this instance of a «Confession» bears no such validation, and with its title misleads a part of the faithful people by appearing like a similar «Confession».

b) This «Confession» asserts in a paragraph that all those who communicate with the heterodox and pray together with them automatically place themselves outside the Church. This signifies that all the Patriarchs and remaining Primates of the Orthodox Churches, along with their Holy Synods, as participants in such communications and dialogues, have automatically placed themselves outside the Church!!! Those who have signed the «Confession» have in this manner proclaimed all of us as being outside the Church, that is, as schismatics, and it is a wonder that they have not yet interrupted sacramental communion with us, since we are - according to them - «outside the Church». At any rate, the seed of schism is inherent in the aforementioned expressions of the «Confession», and this should raise concern among all the pastors of the Church.

c) This concern is intensified, on account of the fact that the said «Confession» is signed - among others - by certain Metropolitans of the Autocephalous Church of Greece, as though the Confession (Creed) that they were given during their ordination was not enough for them. We want to believe that the signatory Hierarchs did this without fully realizing that in this way they are leading towards a schism within the Orthodox Hierarchy, given that all the Orthodox Churches have approved communications with the heterodox, through conciliar decisions.

Because it is inconceivable that these bishops, with their signatures on the said «Confession» on the one hand are proclaiming that all those who participate in communications with the heterodox «automatically place themselves outside the Church», but in their liturgical and their other life regard themselves as being in communion with them, and in fact even commemorating their name during the Divine Liturgy.

Your Beatitude,

Communications with the heterodox, including the theological dialogues with them, are not the actions of certain Churches or persons, but, as We said, they are conciliar decisions of all the Orthodox Churches, without exception, including Your Most Holy Church of Greece, as per the unanimous decision of the 3rd Pre-Conciliar Pan-Orthodox Convention (1986) and the hereto attached photocopies of the sent agreements that pertain to the content of our dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church.

The ascertainment that this detail has been forgotten by the signatories of the said «Confession» causes immense grief. The Church of Greece, by not condemning but instead silently condoning the circulation of texts appearing as a «Confession of Faith» - such as the one in question, through which all participants in the relations with the heterodox are placed outside the Church and in fact signed by bishops of Hers - causes concern not only to Her flock, but also to Her communion with the remaining Orthodox Churches.

We therefore ask Your Beatitude and your attending honorable Hierarchy to take an official stance as soon as possible, opposite this so-called «Confession of Faith» and those of the clergy who have endorsed it, bearing in mind the danger that this display of tolerance harbors for the unity of the Church, or, as it appears, the encouraging of such divisive actions by certain of Her bishops also.

Having announced these things to Your Beatitude, We also embrace You with a brotherly kiss and remain, with very much love in the Lord and special honour».

Source: http://www.oodegr.com/english/papismos/what_pan_orthodox_decision.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And the following is the response to the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

Your Holiness, WHAT "pan-Orthodox decision"?

by fr. Anastasios K. Gotsopoulos,
Parish Priest of St.George's Church, Patrae.


Patrae, 6.10.09


Source: http://www.oodegr.com/english/papismos/what_pan_orthodox_decision.htm

A letter by the Ecumenical Patriarch addressed to the Archbishop of Athens has been made public, in which the Patriarch is vigorously protesting against the composition and circulation of the "Confession of Faith against Ecumenism", which has been endorsed by a host of laypeople and clergymen, and by several Hierarchs.


His Holiness has not commented on the essence of the "Confession"; instead, he has placed the blame on the editors and all those who signed it, because:

1. In the "Confession" it apparently says -according to the Ecumenical Patriarch- that «all those who communicate with the heterodox....automatically place themselves outside the Church».

2. those who refuse the inter-Christian dialogue are opposing «conciliar decisions of all the Orthodox Churches without exception, including our Most Holy Church of Greece, as per the unanimous decision of the 3rd Pre-conciliar Pan-Orthodox Conference (1986)».

Α. Except that:

1. Nowhere in the text proper of the "Confession" does it say: «all those who communicate with the heterodox» are culpable, but rather, it refers to those who have accepted and who preach in practice and in word the "pan-heresy" (in the words of fr. Justin Popovitch) of Ecumenism! To quote :

"This pan-heresy has been accepted by many Orthodox patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, clergymen, monks and laity. They teach it, «barefacedly»; they apply it and impose it in practice, communing with heretics in every possible manner - with common prayers, with exchanges of visits, with pastoral collaborations - thus essentially placing themselves outside the Church."

Nowhere does the "Confession" say that even the ecumenists «automatically place themselves outside the Church», as the Patriarch asserts in His letter! Quite obviously, the composers of the "Confession", being the well-versed theologians that they are, are fully aware that there is no such thing as an "automatic" exit from the Church !

The "Confession" very clearly says: ".....thus essentially placing themselves outside the Church" (paragraph 8).

There is a vast difference in meaning, between the words "automatically" and "essentially" !

2. The Patriarch states that «all the Orthodox Churches have approved communications with the heterodox, through conciliar decisions » and consequently, all those who criticize what goes on in the Dialogue are supposedly opposing Pan-Orthodox decisions!

We beg to be allowed - with all due respect to the Patriarch of our Nation - to also pose the following questions publicly (because privately sent letters are not responded to, by the pertinent officials of the Throne):

a. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that abolished the Encyclical by the Patriarch Athenagoras' Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in which common prayer had been outrightly condemned as "opposing the sacred canons and blunting the confessional sensitivity of the Orthodox?" Is today's attitude - by some - in accordance with this Encyclical by the Sacred Synod of the Patriarchate, on the matter of common prayer?

b. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» gave permission to the Pope to not merely attend, but to almost actively participate in a Patriarchal Divine Liturgy, dressed in his official vestments?

c. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» obligated the Ecumenical Patriarch to give and receive the liturgical embrace with the Pope during the Divine Eucharist of the Throne's Celebration in 2006?

d. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that gave the Pope permission to pray on behalf of the Orthodox fold during the Lord's Prayer in (may I be permitted to say) the most official of Divine Liturgies in the Patriarchal Temple?

e. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» had ever relinquished the Bema of the Patriarchal Temple so that the papal primacy could be barefacedly preached there? Imagine, fallacy being preached from that very same Bema of Saints Alexander, Gregory, Chrysostom, Photios, Filotheos!Isn't that sacrilege?

f. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that decided the heresy-persisting Pope should be lauded as "the venerable Pastor and President" - inside the very Patriarchal Temple itself, and in the presence of the Patriarch, no less?

g. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that permitted the lauding of the Papist heresy as "a venerable Church, the See of Peter", at the First Throne of Constantinople, and in fact inside the very Patriarchal Temple itself, and in the presence of the Patriarch?

h. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that abolished the 16 Sacred Canons (by Holy Fathers, Local and Ecumenical Synods), and ruled that common prayers with heretics thereafter would no longer constitute a canonical misdemeanor?

i. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that had approved the drafting of regulations for "confessional" or "inter-confessional" common prayer during the meetings of the World Council of Churches?

j. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that had sanctioned the provocative text of the 9th General Meeting of the World Council of Churches in Porto Allegre (2006), according to which, "Each church (of the 340 Protestant groups of the W.C.C.) is the Church catholic, but not the whole of it. Each church fulfils its catholicity when it is in communion with the other churches." ?! In that same document, ecclesiastic hypostasis was also recognized in all the Protestant heretical "churches" of the W.C.C., and it was accepted, that the plethora of their cacodoxies and fallacies were "legitimately different formulations of the faith of the Church" and "varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit"! Is it ever possible that a Pan-Orthodox approval for blasphemies such as these could exist?

k. Which «Pan-Orthodox decision» was it, that empowered the Ecumenical Patriarch to offer the Holy Chalice to the Uniate Archbishop of Athens? Wasn't Unia outrightly condemned, in "conciliar decisions of all the Orthodox Churches, without exception [...] as is the unanimous decision of the 3rd Pre-Conciliar, Pan-Orthodox Conference (1986)"? Why are these unanimously decided, Pan-Orthodox rulings so blatantly disregarded, when they have specifically condemned Unia? Why the selective use of "Pan-Orthodox decisions"?

Furthermore :

I. Didn't our Patriarch stop to think when offering that Holy Chalice as a gift to the Uniate Archbishop, what a bitter cup it was for the Church of Greece, but also for the other Orthodox Churches, who even today are sighing under the methodical plans of Unia? How will this act by our Patriarch resound in those long-suffering - and still suffering - from Unia brethren of ours in Eastern Europe but also in the Middle East? Isn't that provoking Pan-Orthodox unity?

II. How would our Patriarch feel, if the Archbishop of Athens were to offer a Holy Chalice as a gift to "father Efthym" ? (My apologies, for the cruel parallel...)


Historical note on "father Efthym":
The Turkish authorities supported with every means the establishment, in September 1923, of the so-called ‘Turkish Orthodox Church', which was founded by father Efthym Karahisarides Erenerol, a priest from Keskin, Anatolia, who was the blind instrument of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, head of the Young Turks. "father Efthym" is the Head of this Turkish, schismatic, Nationalist Orthodox Church, whose aim it is to usurp the authority of the Patriarchate in the Turkish domain, and to subjugate the Orthodox in Turkey to the nationalist designs of the State. In other words, something equivalent to the usurping of Orthodoxy by the Papist Uniates.

And questions like these have no end to them.... but they also have no answers...

The above are just a small reminder, for the debunking of the excuse of the alleged "Pan-Orthodox decisions" ! If only those who lead the dialogue nowadays respected and upheld all of the Pan-Orthodox decisions! All of them, and not selectively! Because, there has never been a Pan-Orthodox Synod that has altered Orthodox Ecclesiology, or abolished Sacred Canons that have been validated by three Ecumenical Synods, or given the right to breach ecclesiastic tradition and order - which is what has been frequently happening nowadays in the space of Ecumenism. If that ever did happen, then any Synod whatsoever - even a "Pan-Orthodox" one - would be negating itself and turned into a "convention of the lawless" and a "synagogue of wicked ones". Besides, the "ecumenist" or "robber" character of a synod is not determined by the number and the representation of those participating in it, but chiefly by the decisions that it arrives at!

Β. Consequently, all those who accuse the ones exercising criticism (on the matter of the dialogues) - of supposedly being opposed to the dialogues per se - well, unless they are slandering by deliberately distorting reality, they are making a huge mistake!
Because NO! WE ARE NOT AGAINST THE DIALOGUE! There cannot be a Christian who refuses any dialogue. Because Christ Himself conversed with sinners. However, we need to be careful, because it was Christ Himself Who had also refused a dialogue: He had refused to talk, even when provoked: He had refused a dialogue with Pilate, the High Priests of the Great Sanhedrin, and with King Herod!

We therefore agree to dialogues, in the manner that our Lord did!
But we also oppose dialogues, in the manner that our Lord did:
when certain prerequisites that have been clearly defined by ecclesiastic Tradition are not fulfilled.
Therefore, we are against the dialogue (the "useless game", according to the words of its 20-year-long co-Chairman, the Archbishop Stylianos of Australia), the way it is being conducted nowadays. I will indicatively mention three characteristic points only:

1. The systematic disregard for ecclesiastic tradition, with the ever-increasing and intensified common prayers! We have gone beyond ordinary common prayers, and have rapidly moved on to common officiating (incomplete, for the time being).... And what is even worse: we are striving to impose our iniquity as a law of God (refer to the opinion of Pheidas regarding common prayer)!

2. Certain «professionals» (in the words of prof.Veltsis) of the dialogue are deciding in absentia of the people of God (laity and clergy), and even in absentia of the very Synods of the Autocephalous Churches.

For example: Six Autocephalous Churches - in other words, almost half of Orthodoxy! - the Patriarchate of Jerusalem, the Church of Serbia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Czech Republic and Slovakia - did not participate, and had synodically condemned the Balamand Statement (7th meeting of the Joint Commission, 1993), as entirely unacceptable from the Orthodox point of view, foreign to Orthodox Tradition, and contrary to the decisions of Pan-Orthodox Conferences (refer to the letter dated 8-12-1994 by the Holy Synod of the Church of Greece addressed to Patriarch Bartholomew)! And yet, none of the «professionals» concerned themselves with these facts and the dialogue continues, with the Orthodox representatives regarding this statement as valid and a basis for discussions on the course of the dialogue!


Is this attitude reminiscent of respect towards the Synods of six Autocephalous Churches? Does this behaviour perhaps display a respect for pan-Orthodox unity?

3. In Pan-Orthodox decisions, Unia is condemned repeatedly. And yet, participating in the dialogue are....Uniates! Where, therefore, is there a respect towards the Pan-Orthodox decisions, in the dialogue as conducted today?

Who, therefore, is showing disregard towards the Pan-Orthodox decisions? Those who are exercising criticism with a theological basis, or perhaps those who are actively involved in a "useless game"?

C. There are some who protested, because - as they claim - the "Confession of Faith against Ecumenism" will be .... "unchurching" them from the Church! (ousting them from the Church)

However, we all need to observe carefully, as follows:

1.No-one should worry, or be alarmed, because nobody can be "unchurched" with signatures! Regardless how many signatures by the laity and clergy and Hierarchs are collected!

2.But no-one should rest assured either, that with their signatures they are able to "unchurch" others and thus be done with their protesting! Any silencing whatsoever of the others' opinion cannot be an acceptable thing - not in the Church, and not in our society!

3.Each one of us must however remain alert, because there is the inherent risk of "unchurching" himself - not "automatically" (!) but "essentially", on account of his own utterings and attitude. An official case of "unchurching" may delay, or may not even manifest itself in this lifetime... but what about in the other life?

Let's not forget the case of Saint Maximus the Confessor: a simple monk who fought for the faith and our Church's tradition, against practically the entire Pentarchy (the Patriarchs of Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria and Antioch) - the "official" "Church" - which had subjugated itself to heresy! He didn't "unchurch" a single one of them; quite the opposite: he was "unchurched", by the powerful (in this world) Patriarchs etc., and he died in exile! But along came a (post mortem) 6th Ecumenical Synod, which based itself on the theology of that simple monk, Maximus, and in fact vindicated that simple monk, and furthermore defrocked, condemned and anathematized SEVEN PATRIARCHS and other Bishops, AS HERETICS!

For the historical record, those condemned were :

· the Pope of Rome, Honorius !

· the 4 Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople : Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul II and Peter !

· the Patriarch of Alexandria, Cyrus !

· the Patriarch of Antioch, Makarios ! and

· bishops Stephanos, Polychronios and Constantine !

D. At the end of His letter, the Ecumenical Patriarch asks of the Archbishop of Athens and his attending "honourable Hierarchy to take an official stance, the soonest, opposite this "Confession of Faith against Ecumenism" and those of the clergy who had endorsed it!"

It is truly worth wondering why the Ecumenical Patriarch and His attending Synod are asking the Church of Greece to take a stance, and why they themselves did not tackle "those of the clergy who had endorsed it", the way that the ever-memorable Christodoulos had done in the past...
It would surely have circumvented possible problems of unity in our Hierarchy!

· Undoubtedly, it is especially sad when a Father confronts the agony of his children as if it were a hostile move, and places himself "opposite [...] those of the clergy" - in other words, his own children!
· It is especially sad, when the Father heads a dialogue outside his own home, with all the neighbors, near and far, but systematically refuses to talk to his own children about their justified - or even unjustified - reservations!
· It is especially sad, when he conducts a "Theological Dialogue" with the heterodox, but refuses to conduct a theological dialogue with His own, co-believing, co-deacons in the Body of Christ!
· It is especially sad, when he asks for measures "opposite" his children - I wonder, what measures would they be? Perhaps preventive censorship and a silencing of other opinions? Where is this going ?

However, woe betide the father who disregards the cry of agony by his children. He only manages to undermine his paternal authority in their conscience.... And let's not overlook the fact that paternal authority cannot be imposed by putting a gag on critique; it can only be inspired, even in "unruly" children. If this applies in biological paternity, how much more so, in spiritual paternity!

At any rate, let it be made absolutely clear to everyone that with the Hierarchs, the Hagiorites and the other Abbots with their Brotherhoods, as well as all the other clergymen and monastics and laity, from the many Orthodox Churches who, before God and our conscience, by endorsing the "Confession of Faith against Ecumenism", we are merely expressing our sorrow and our disagreement with the systematic disregard for our ecclesiastic tradition, as displayed in the space of Ecumenism. We are, and we shall remain, members of our Church, no matter what happens! Even if we are embittered by our Fathers and denied our filial status on account of their attitude, we shall remain members of our Orthodox Church!

Saturday, October 04, 2008

Synod: 253 bishops from around the world but none from China

10/03/2008 17:53
VATICAN

Vatican City (AsiaNews) – The 12th General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops opens this Sunday with a solemn Mass celebrated by Benedict XVI. Dedicated to “The Word of God in the Life and the Mission of the Church”, it brings together 253 bishops from the Churches of the world, except those from Communist China, Vatican Press Office Head Fr Federico Lombardi said today at a press conference. “It was clear that there would be no agreement [with Beijing] and they [Chinese bishops] won't come,” he said “because the conditions weren’t there.”

There will be however, as delegates directly appointed by Benedict XVI, Card Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, archbishop of Hong Kong, Mgr José Lai Hung-seng, archbishop of Macau as well as a Taiwanese bishop, Mgr Peter Liu Cheng-chung.

The bishops will take part in activities scheduled to last until 26 October “to reflect”, said Archbishop Nikola Eterovic, secretary general of the Synod of Bishops, “on the Word of God, on its central role in the life of the Church and on its dynamism which encourages Christians in mission to announce in words and deeds the Good News and the presence in our midst of the Risen Lord Jesus.”

For the first time the Synod will open in the St. Paul's Outside-the-Walls Basilica, not in the Vatican, because of the ongoing Pauline Year. and this will not be the only reference to the Apostle to the Nations.

In the Synod Hall on 18 October, the Holy Father Benedict XVI and the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I will preside at first Vespers. Each will then pronounce an address on the subject of the Word of God, with particular reference to the Pauline Year.

This will be the first time the Ecumenical Patriarch addresses the Synod Fathers. “He will bring the greetings of Orthodox Churches that the Apostle to the Nations founded before going to Rome where he suffered martyrdom,” Archbishop Eterovic said.

The Synod will be ecumenically important for fraternal delegates from ten Churches and ecclesial communities will attend.

Representatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate will be present along with others from the Patriarchates of Moscow, Serbia and Romania, from the Orthodox Church of Greece and the Armenian Apostolic Church, as well as from the Anglican Communion, the World Lutheran Federation, the Church of the Disciples of Christ and the World Council of Churches.

The Synod Fathers will represent 13 sui iuris Eastern Catholic Churches, 113 Bishops’ conferences, 25 dicasteries of the Roman Curia and the Union of Superiors General.

Of the 253 Synod Fathers 51 are from Africa, 62 from America, 41 from Asia, 90 from Europe and 9 from Oceania. Of these 173 were elected (72.3 per cent), 38 participate ex officio (15 per cent), 32 were appointed by the Pope (12.6 per cent) and 10 were elected by the Union of Superiors General (4 per cent).

Forty-one experts and 37 auditors from 21 and 26 countries respectively will also be in attendance, including six women experts and 19 women auditors, one more than the men.
The Synod Three will also receive three special papal guests. The first one is Chief Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen of Haifa, Israel, who on 6 October will address the assembly on how the Jewish people reads and interprets Sacred Scripture. As such it will be the first time that a rabbi, and a non-Christian, has addressed the Synod Fathers.

The other special guests are Rev A Miller Milloy, secretary general of the United Bible Societies, and Frère Alois, prior of the Taizé Community.

SOURCE:

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Hierarchs of World orthodoxy participated ecumenical services in Armenia

Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople (Ecumenical Patriarchate), Metropolitan Valentine of Orenburg and Buzuluk (Moscow Patriarchate) and representatives of eleven more "sister-churches" accompanied Catholicos of All Armenians Garegin II inblessing the Chrism for Armenian Apostolic Church in Etchmiadzin on September 28.

Armenian Apostolic Church uses two relics to bless the Chrism: the Right Hand of St. Gregory, the Enlightener of Armenia, and Holy Spear of Crucifixion. During the ceremony of blessing the Chrism, the Right Hand of St. Gregory was used by Catholicos of All Armenians Garegin II (Monophysites), and the Holy Spear was given to Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople (World Orthodoxy).

The following Church leaders and representatives participated the ceremony: Metropolitan Valentine of the Diocese of Orenburg and Buzuluk, of the Russian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate; Cardinal Leonardo Sandri, Prefect of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches, who led the delegation for the Roman Catholic Church; His Bishop Benjamin of Menoufeya from the Coptic Orthodox Church; Metropolitan Mor Eustathius Matta Roham of Jazirah and Euphrates of the Syrian Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch and All the East; H.G. Dr. Thomas Mar Athanasios, Metropolitan of the Chengannur Diocese who led the delegation of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church of India; Geoffrey Rowell, Bishop of Gibraltar in Europe of the Anglican Church, Mgr. Vartan Ashkarian, General Representative of the Patriarchal Eparchy of the Armenian Catholic Church; Father Yeghia Kilaghbian, Abbot of the Armenian Mkhitarist Congregation of San Lazzaro; as well as representeatives from the World Council of Churches, and the organization "World Conference of Religions for Peace".

The day before (on September 28) the same members of "sister-churches" presided by Garegin II served a memorial service for the victims of the Armenian Genocide. Prior to the start of the service, a wreath was laid at the memorial. During the service the participants offered joint prayers in their own languages for the victims of the Genocide. Following the service, members of the delegations visited the Genocide Museum.

SOURCE:

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Patriarch concludes Armenian visit

Shortly before his departure from the Armenian capital of Yerevan on Monday, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I (Vartholomeos) was received by Armenian President Serzh Sargsian, who stressed the importance he attached to the Armenian Orthodox Church and preserving Armenia's national identity.

Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew on Saturday began an official visit to Armenia, where he took part in ceremonies of the Armenian Orthodox Church.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

ADDRESS OF HIS ALL HOLINESS ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH B A R T H O L O M E W TO THE PLENARY ASSEMBLY OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Your Excellency Mr President of the European Parliament,

Your Excellencies, Honorable Members of the European Parliament,Distinguished Guests,

Dear Friends,

First and foremost, we convey to you salutations from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, based for many many centuries in what is today Istanbul – greetings replete with esteem and respect. In particular, we express our gratitude to an old friend of ours, His Excellency Hans-Gert Pöttering, President of the European Parliament. We likewise express our sincerest appreciation for the extraordinary honor to address the Plenary of the European Parliament, especially on this occasion that commemorates the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue.

As a purely spiritual institution, our Ecumenical Patriarchate embraces a truly global apostolate that strives to raise and broaden the consciousness of the human family – to bring understanding that we are all dwelling in the same house. At its most basic sense, this is the meaning of the word “ecumenical” – for the “oikoumene” is the inhabited world – the earth understood as a house in which all peoples, kindreds, tribes and languages dwell.

As is well known, the origins of our religious institution lie at the core of the Axial Age, deep in the history of the Christian Faith – with the earliest followers of Jesus Christ. Inasmuch as our See – our institutional center – shared the center and capital of the Christian Roman Empire, it became known as “ecumenical,” with certain privileges and responsibilities that it holds to this day. One of its chief responsibilities was for bringing the redemptive message of the Gospel to the world outside the Roman Empire. In the days before the exploratory age, most civilizations held such a bicameral view of the world as being “within” and “without.” The world was divided into two sectors: a hemisphere of civilization and a hemisphere of barbarism. In this history, we behold the grievous consequences of the alienation of human persons from one another.

Today, when we have the technological means to transcend the horizon of our own cultural self-awareness, we nevertheless continue to witness the terrible effects of human fragmentation. Tribalism, fundamentalism, and phyletism – which is extreme nationalism without regard to the rights of the other – all these contribute to the ongoing list of atrocities that give pause to our claims of being civilized in the first place.


And yet, even with tides of trade, migrations and expansions of peoples, religious upheavals and revivals, and great geopolitical movements, the deconstruction of rigid and monolithic self-understandings of past centuries has yet to find a permanent harbor. The Ecumenical Patriarchate has sailed across the waves of these centuries, navigating the storms and the doldrums of history. For twenty centuries – through the Pax Romana, the Pax Christiana, the Pax Islamica, the Pax Ottomanica (all epochs marked by intercultural struggle, conflict and outright war) – the Ecumenical Patriarchate has continued as a lighthouse for the human family and the Christian Church. It is from the depths of our experience upon these deep waters of history that we offer to the contemporary world a timeless message of perennial human value.

Today, the ecumenical scope of our Patriarchate extends far beyond the boundaries of its physical presence at the cusp of Europe and Asia, in the same City we have inhabited for the seventeen centuries since her founding. Though small in quantity, the extensive quality of our experience brings us before this august assembly today, in order to share from that experience on the necessity of intercultural dialogue, a lofty and timely ideal for the contemporary world.

As you yourselves have said – in this most esteemed body’s own words:

At the heart of the European project, it is important to provide the means for intercultural dialogue and dialogue between citizens to strengthen respect for cultural diversity and deal with the complex reality in our societies and the coexistence of different cultural identities and beliefs. (Decision No 1983/2006 of EP and CEU)

And we would humbly supplement this noble statement, as we did last year in our address to the Plenary of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, in Strasbourg.

Dialogue is necessary first and foremost because it is inherent in the nature of the human person.

This is the principal message that we propose for your consideration today: that intercultural dialogue is at the very root of what it means to be a human being, for no one culture of the human family encompasses every human person. Without such dialogue, the differences in the human family are reduced to objectifications of the “other” and lead to abuse, conflict, persecution – a grand scale human suicide, for we are all ultimately one humanity. But where the differences between us move us to encounter one another and where that encounter is based in dialogue, there is reciprocal understanding and appreciation – even love.

In the past fifty years, our human family has experienced leaps of technological achievement undreamed of by our forebears. Many have trusted that this kind of advancement will bridge the divides that fragment the human condition. As if, our achievements had given us the power to overcome the fundamental realities of our moral and – may we say – our spiritual condition. Yet, despite every conceivable benefit and technological skill – skill that seems to outstrip our anthropological wit, we still behold the universal banes of hunger, thirst, war, persecution, injustice, planned misery, intolerance, fanaticism and prejudice.

Amidst this cycle that cannot seem to be broken, the significance of the “European Project” cannot be underestimated. It is one of the hallmarks of the European Union that has succeeded in promoting mutual, peaceful and productive co-existence between nation states that less than seventy years ago were drenched in a bloody conflict that could have destroyed the legacy of Europe for the ages.

Here, in this great hall of assembly of the Parliament, you strive to make possible the relationships between states and political realities that make reconciliation between persons possible. Thus you have recognized the importance of intercultural dialogue, especially at a time in the history of Europe when transformations are taking place in every country and along every societal boundary. Great tidal forces of conflict, and economic security and opportunity have shifted populations around the globe. Of necessity then, persons of differing cultural, ethnic, religious and national origin find themselves in close proximity. In some cases, populations are excluded from the broader societal context. In some cases, the same populations shun the greater whole and close themselves off from the dominant society. But in either case, as we engage in dialogue, it must not be a mere academic exercise in mutual appreciation.

For dialogue to be effective, to be transformative in bringing about core change in persons, it cannot be done on the basis of “subject” and “object.” The value of the “other” must be absolute – without objectification; so that each party is apprehended in the fullness of their being.

For Orthodox Christians, the icon, or image, stands not only as an acme of human aesthetic accomplishment, but as a tangible reminder of this perennial truth. As in every painting – religious or not and notwithstanding the talent of the artist– the object presents as two dimensional. Yet, for Orthodox Christians, an icon is no mere religious painting – and it is not, by definition, a religious object. Indeed, it is a subject with which the viewer, the worshipper, enters into wordless dialogue through the sense of sight. For an Orthodox Christian, the encounter with the icon is an act of communion with the person represented in the icon. How much more should our encounters with living icons – persons made in the image and likeness of God – be acts of communion!

In order for our dialogue to become more than mere cultural exchange, there must be a more profound understanding of the absolute interdependence – not merely of states and political and economic actors – but the interdependence of every single human person with every other single human person. And such a valuation must be made regardless of any commonality of race, religion, language, ethnicity, national origin, or any of the benchmarks by which we seek self identification and self identity. And in a world of billions of persons, how is such inter-connectedness possible?

Indeed, there is no possible way to link with every human person – this is a property that we would ascribe to the Divine. However, there is a way of understanding the universe in which we live as being shared by all – a plane of existence that spans the reality of every human person – an ecosphere that contains us all.

Thus it is that the Ecumenical Patriarchate – in keeping with our own sense of responsibility for the house, the oikos of the world and all who dwell therein, has for decades championed the cause of the environment, calling attention to ecological crises around the globe. And we engage this ministry without regard to self interest. As you know so well, our Patriarchate is not a “national” Church, but rather the fundamental canonical expression of the ecumenical dimensions of the Gospel message, and of its analogous responsibility within the life of the Church. This is the deeper reason that the Church Fathers and the Councils have given it the name, “Ecumenical.” The loving care of the Church of Constantinople exceeds any linguistic, cultural, ethnic and even religious definition, as She seeks to serve all peoples. Although firmly rooted in particular history – as any other institution is – the Ecumenical Patriarchate transcends historical categories in Her perennial mission of service.

In our service to the environment, we have to date sponsored seven scientific symposia that bring together a host of disciplines. The genesis of our initiative grew on the island that gave humanity the Apocalypse, Book of Revelation, the sacred island of Patmos in the Aegean Sea. And it was in the Aegean that we commenced, in 1995, an ambitious program of integrating current scientific knowledge about the oceans with the spiritual approach of the world's religions to water, particularly the world's oceans. Since Patmos we have traversed the Danube, the Adriatic Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Amazon, the Arctic Sea, and we are now making preparations to sail the Nile in Egypt and the Mississippi River in the United States next year.

What we seek is not only an ongoing dialogue that is serviceable to practical necessities, but also one that raises human consciousness. While we strive to find answers to ecological concerns and crises, we also bring the participants into a more comprehensive sense of themselves as belonging to and relating to a greater whole. We seek to embrace the ecosphere of human existence not as an object to be controlled, but as a fellow-struggler on the path of increase and improvement. As the Apostle Paul, whose 2000 year legacy both the Orthodox and the Roman Catholic Churches are celebrating this year, says in one of his most famous epistles:

For we know that until now, the whole of creation groans with us and shares our birth pangs. (Romans 8:22)

Every ecosystem on this planet is like a nation – by definition limited to a place. The estuary is not the tundra, nor is the savanna the desert. But like every culture, every ecosystem will have an effect that goes beyond far beyond its natural – or in the case of cultures, national, boundaries. And when we understand that every ecosystem is part of the singular ecosphere that is inhabited by every living breath that fills the world, then do we grasp the interconnectedness, the powerful communion of all life, and our true interdependency on one another. Without such an understanding, we are led to ecocide, the self-destruction of the one ecosphere that sustains all human existence.

Thus it is that we come before you today, highlighting this Year of Intercultural Dialogue, bringing parables from the natural world to affirm your transcendent human values. As an institution, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has lived as a relatively small ecosystem within a much larger culture for centuries. Out of this long experience, allow us to suggest the most important practical characteristic that enables the work of intercultural dialogue to succeed.

Chiefly and above all, there must be respect for the rights of the minority within every majority. When and where the rights of the minority are observed, the society will for the most part be just and tolerant. In any culture, one segment will always be dominant – whether that dominance is based on race, religion or any other category. Segmentation is inevitable in our diverse world. What we seek to end is fragmentation! Societies that are built upon exclusion and repression cannot last. Or as the divine Prince of Peace Jesus Christ said:

Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand. (St. Matthew 12:25).

Our counsel to all is to recognize that only when we embrace the fullness of shared presence within the ecosphere of human existence, are we then able to face the “otherness” of those around us – majority or minority – with a true sense of the consanguinity of the human family. Then do we behold the stranger amongst us not as an alien, but as a brother or sister in the human family, the family of God. St. Paul expounds on pan-human relation and brotherhood quite eloquently and concisely when addressing the Athenians.

This is why Europe needs to bring Turkey into its Project and why Turkey needs to foster intercultural dialogue and tolerance in order to be accepted into the European Project. Europe should not see any religion that is tolerant of others as alien to itself. The great religions, like the European Project, can be a force that transcend nationalism and can even transcend nihilism and fundamentalism by focusing their faithful on what unites us as human beings, and by fostering a dialogue about what divides us.

From our country, Turkey, we perceive both a welcome to a new economic and trading partner, but we also feel the hesitation that comes from embracing, as an equal, a country that is predominantly Muslim. And yet Europe is filled with millions of Muslims who have come here from all sorts of backgrounds and causations; just as Europe would still be filled with Jews, had it not been for the horrors of the Second World War.

Indeed, it is not only non-Christians that Europe must encounter, but Christians who do not fit into the categories of Catholic or Protestant. The resurgence of the Orthodox Church in Eastern Europe since the fall of the Iron Curtain has truly been a marvel for the world to behold. The segmentation of Eastern Europe has led to fragmentation in many places. Not only does the center not hold; it is hardly discernable. Through this process, as nation states strive to re-establish themselves, it is the Orthodox Christian faith that has risen, even above economic indicators, to a new status that could not have been predicted even twenty years ago.

One of the vital roles of our Ecumenical Patriarchate is to assist in the process of growth and expansion that is taking place in traditional Orthodox countries, by holding fast as the canonical norm for the worldwide Orthodox Church, over a quarter of a billion people around the globe. At this moment, we wish to inform you that in October, at our invitation, all the Heads of the Orthodox Patriarchates and Autocephalous Churches will meet in Istanbul, in order to discuss our common problems and to strengthen Pan-Orthodox unity and cooperation. Simultaneously, we will also concelebrate the two thousand years since the birth of the Apostle of the Nations Paul.

Currently in the City (Istanbul) we are experiencing great joy and enthusiasm as we are all preparing for its celebration as the European Capital of Culture in the year 2010. The City, which has a long history, was a crossroads for gatherings of people and served as a place of cohabitation of diverse religions and cultures. This past week, we attended a luncheon hosted by the Prime Minister of Turkey in honor of the Prime Minister of Spain. As it is public knowledge, both are co-sponsors of the Alliance of Civilizations under the auspices of the United Nations. We heard their wonderful speeches which were harmonious with the diachronic tolerant spirit of our City.

Your Excellencies, Honorable Members of the European Parliament: the Ecumenical Patriarchate stands ready to make vital contributions to the peace and prosperity of the European Union. We are prepared to partner with you in constructive dialogues such as this, and to lend willing ears to the concerns of the day. In this spirit, our Patriarchate for the past twenty-five years has been cultivating and developing academic dialogues with Islam and Judaism. We have realized many bilateral and tri-lateral meetings. In early November in Athens, we will have our twelfth stage dialogue with Islam.

Parallel to the aforementioned dialogues, we continue theological dialogues with the Roman Catholic, Anglican, Lutheran, and Reformed Churches. In October, at the invitation of the Pope, we will have the opportunity to address the twelfth General Ordinary Assembly of the Synod of Bishops at the Vatican.

In summary, the Ecumenical Patriarchate is very active in the sphere of ecumenical dialogue with the purpose of contributing to a better understanding of people, reconciliation, peace, solidarity, and for the estrangement from fanaticism, hatred, and all forms of evil.

We thank you for this singular opportunity to address you today, and we pray the abundant mercy of God and His blessing upon all your righteous endeavors. Please allow us from this honorable podium to offer our best wishes to the Muslim faithful around the globe for the upcoming Great Feast of Ramadan and also our best wishes to the Jewish faithful throughout the world for the upcoming Feast of Rosh Ha Shanah.

We are all brothers and sisters with one heavenly Father and on this beautiful planet, which we are all responsible for, there is room for everyone, but there is no room for wars and killing of one another.

We thank you once again for the great honor and privilege of addressing all of you here today.

-------------------

AP Başkanı Poettering'in yaptığı konuşma metni:

Word of Welcome by Hans-Gert Poettering,

President of the European Parliament

Solemn Sitting of the European Parliament on the occasion of the visit by

His All Holiness the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew

in the context of the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue

Brussels, 24 September 2008


Your All Holiness

Eminent Metropolitans

President of the Commission, Jose Manuel Durrao-Barroso

President in office of the Council, Minister Jouyet

Colleagues

It is both an honour and a pleasure to welcome Your All Holiness to the European Parliament in Brussels for this Solemn Session during 2008 the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue.

The first intercultural guest to address our plenary session this year, the Grand Mufti of Damascus, came from Syria, a country which neighbours your own country of Turkey. Both countries are at the heart of the biblical world, within a region that gave birth to the world’s three great monotheistic religions - Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

People from all three religions have lived in close proximity for centuries; sadly, not always in peaceful relationship with each other. Indeed, even today there are parts of the broader Middle East region where tensions exist between the different communities. Of course the terrible situation in Israel and Palestine is the most extreme case.

However, on the other hand there are numerous examples in the region of religious tolerance, of harmonious relations between peoples of different religious convictions. During my recent visit to Syria, I had the opportunity to meet spiritual leaders of all the various traditions and they assured me of the excellent conditions pertaining in that country with regard to freedom of religious expression.

The European Union is a community based on values, the most fundamental of which is the inherent dignity of every human person. In this respect religious freedom is central to human dignity and goes beyond any powers that state authorities by seek to evoke. The separation of church and state which we value so much, is a guarantee for the freedom of action of church authorities in the administration of their own affairs and in their relationship with their flocks.

The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, which is based in Phanar in Istanbul., was established in the fourth century and is an important spiritual home for 300 million Orthodox Christians throughout the world.

The word Phanar means “lighthouse”. And you, Your All Holiness, through your life of peace and gospel of love, have been a constant beam of light to your followers in the Orthodox world. Here in the European Union recent enlargements have added the majority-Orthodox countries of Cyprus, Bulgaria and Romania. Greece has been a member since 1981.

The late Pope John Paul II used the metaphor of Europe breathing again with its two lungs after the downfall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe. We could also use this metaphor to refer to the richness in the enlarged EU brought through the different perspectives of Western and Eastern Christianity.

The former Ottoman Empire displayed a remarkable tolerance with regard to religious diversity, even at a time when such tolerance was sadly absent in many parts of Europe. At one time almost 40% of the Sultan’s subjects were Christian. The Ecumenical Patriarchate centered on the “New Rome” has a long history of interaction with the Islamic world and I am sure we can all benefit from the wisdom gleaned over centuries in our attempts to have a constructive dialogue with this world.

In conclusion, I would like to refer briefly to Your All Holiness’ important work in promoting awareness among religious leaders from different faiths of the threat posed to our planet - to creation -by Climate Change. This is a challenge which we can only meet if we fully engage all our citizens at the local level. And in this respect the values system and the parish community structure constitute an important contribution that religions can make towards achieving public goals.

Your All Holiness, we thank you for your visit, and we look forward to what you have to share with us.

-------------------

SOURCE:

Orthodox patriarch backs Turkey's EU bid

The head of the Greek Orthodox Church in İstanbul, Patriarch Bartholomew, urged the European Union on Wednesday to take on Turkey as a member if it improves democratic and human rights standards.

The Orthodox Church is still suffering from problems in EU candidate Turkey despite an improvement in its treatment under the present government, Patriarch Bartholomew, said yesterday in Brussels. "I have to be honest and say that despite many steps taken by our country in modernizing reforms, there are still many things that have to be done before we can talk about a modern democracy which respects religious rights," he told a news conference after addressing the European Parliament.

The patriarch said Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's government had done more to improve the rights of the Orthodox Church than its predecessors but that problems persisted. "In order to survive, we need clergy and when we cannot train these people and prepare them. ... This creates dangers for the present and the future of our patriarchate," Bartholomew said.

"We are talking about a country of 72 million, so the question of 100,000 or 150,000 inhabitants who are not Muslims is not a threat. It is something that can only enrich the country," he said.

In his address to the EU legislature he said Turkey could be a bridge between religions and cultures. Bartholomew endorsed Turkey's ambition to become a full member of the EU, provided it met all the criteria, despite opposition from the leaders of France and Germany.

SOURCE:

Saturday, September 20, 2008

VATICAN 5-26 October 2008 Pope Benedict XVI convenes synod of world's Catholic bishops

The 12th general assembly of the Synod of Bishops meets in October to discuss "The Word of God in the Life and the Mission of the Church." Significantly, Bartholomew I, the 270th patriarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church, will attend this first Synod called by Pope Benedict XVI.

One result of the Vatican Council II of the Catholic Church, which ran 1962 to 1965, was the decision to welcome "fraternal delegations" to synod assemblies. Father Joseph Ratzinger was a theological consultant for the 3-year Council. Now Pope Benedict XVI, he extended an invitation to the Synod to Bartholomew I when he visited the Vatican in March. The Patriarch accepted, and both leaders will address the Synod.

The gesture represents one of the Vatican's few fruitful overtures to leaders of the Eastern rite, or Orthodox, branch of Christianity, which split from the Roman church in the Middle Ages. Vatican sources describe the gesture as in "the spirt of Ravenna," referring to the mixed international commission for theological dialogue between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church that was held in Ravenna, Italy, in October 2007.

Cardinal Walter Kasper, president of the pontifical council for Christian unity, explained the development to Vatican Radio in March as an important step forward, although "the road to full unity is still a very long one." The main obstacle is the Vatican's insistance on the primacy of the Pope.

Pope Paul VI established the Synod as a "permanent council of bishops for the universal Church" in 1965.

This is the first time Pope Benedict XVI has called a synod and chosen its theme. His predecessor, the late Pope John Paul II, had already set the 2005 Synod on the Eucharist in motion.

SOURCE:

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Euro Court Takes a Stand

By Mark D. Tooley
FrontPageMagazine.com Thursday, September 18, 2008

Does good ever come from the European Court? Apparently yes! Or at least occasionally. The court ruled in favor of the Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarchate and against the Turkish Government this summer over a symbolically important property dispute.

Orthodox Christians in what is today Turkey once numbered in the millions. But Islamic pressure over the centuries, continuing through the 20th century, wore down ancient Orthodox communities through attrition. About 30 percent of Turkey was Christian nearly a century ago, most of them Armenian or Greek Orthodox. Today, Christians may number fewer than 100,000 out of a population of over 60 million. And only about 3,000 are Greek Orthodox and under the authority of the Ecumenical Patriarch. Even under an ostensibly secular government since the 1920’s, the dwindling Christian minority in Turkey has suffered under various legal and social pressures, including often insurmountable restrictions against churches retaining, much less purchasing or developing property.

The Ecumenical Patriarch is largely restricted to a small island of property in Istanbul. Until the European Court ruling, the Patriarchate did not legally own any property in Turkey, including its own administration building. Churches and related buildings, by law, are governed by private foundations. Also by Turkish law, the Patriarch must be Turkish born, an increasingly onerous restriction as the number of Orthodox priests in Turkey has declined to a small handful. With Turkey having closed the only Greek Orthodox seminary over 30 years ago, there is a real question as to whether there will be any Orthodox priests in future decades from whom a future Patriarch could be selected.

The most recent dispute between the Patriarchate and the Turkish Government involved an historical orphanage on the Turkish resort island of Buyukada, a property that the Patriarchate bought in 1902. Since the 1930’s, the orphanage was registered as a private foundation because Turkey would not recognize the Patriarchate as a legal entity. Eleven years ago, the Turkish General Directorate for Foundations (Vakiflar), which oversees non-Muslim religious groups, seized the property after deciding the orphanage’s foundation no longer functioned. Church properties have often been seized by the government under this pretext, as Greek Orthodox die off or emigrate. In 1999, the Vakiflar sought to make the orphanage legally independent of the Patriarchate, which fought the seizure in the Turkish courts, finally resorting to the European Court.

In July, the European Court, sitting in Strasbourg, France, ruled that Turkey had violated the property rights clause of the European Convention on Human Rights by seizing the orphanage without financially reimbursing the Patriarchate. The ruling is significant because Turkish non-recognition of property rights for non-Muslim groups is pervasive. And if the court ruling stands, the orphanage site will be the only property in Turkey legally assigned to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom hailed the European Court’s decision in defense of the Patriarchate’s property, noting that Turkey chronically denies non-Muslims the “right to own and maintain property, to train religious clergy, and to offer religious education above high school.”

According to the U.S. Commission, Turkey has “consistently used convoluted regulations and undemocratic laws to confiscate—without opportunity for legal appeal or financial compensation—thousands of religious minority properties, particularly those belonging to the Ecumenical Patriarchate and Greek Orthodox community under patriarchal jurisdiction.

Turkey’s policies have led to the decline—and in some cases, virtual disappearance—of some of these religious minorities on lands they have inhabited for millennia.” The dispute over the Buyukada orphanage, with an estimated real estate value of 80 million Euros, was the first time that the Ecumenical Patriarchate, which normally seeks a low profile, has directly sued the Turkish Government. Turkey has 3 months to appeal the European Court’s decision, which, unless overturned, compels Turkey to return the property or pay for it.

“This is the first time the Ecumenical Patriarchate is recognized as the subject of rights under international law,” one of the lawyers for the Patriarchate told the Athens News. “This is a major guarantee for the church's survival in Turkey." Well, at least the ruling enshrouds the Patriarchate with some legal protection. But there are many other petty harassments of the Patriarchate by Turkish law, which prohibits the Patriarchate from employing the term “ecumenical” for itself. Turkey legally acknowledges the Patriarch as only the chief priest of the tiny Greek Orthodox minority in Turkey, even though the international Orthodox community has recognized the Patriarch as the communion’s senior prelate for 16 centuries. And in Turkey, all citizens must list their religion on their identity papers, which helps to perpetuate different treatment for non-Muslims.

The major seminary for the Orthodox in Turkey has been closed by the government for over 30 years. And non-Turkish Orthodox priests who work for the Patriarchate are unable to gain work visas from Turkey so they have to continuously enter the country as tourists. In meetings with Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and other Turkish officials who belong to the governing Islamic party, the Patriarch has been told that wider freedoms for his flock depend on greater opportunities for Muslims living in Greece. The Patriarch has pointed out that Orthodox living in Turkey are native-born Turkish citizens, while Muslims in Greece, who do in fact have greater liberties, usually are not Greek citizens.

Secularists in Turkey sometimes defend their government’s restrictions on religious activity by arguing that greater freedoms would assist radical Islamists far more than the small Christian minority. But the boxing in of Turkey’s tiny Greek Orthodox population, with the evident hope that it and its senior Patriarch will fade away altogether into the mists of ancient history, seems exceptionally petty. The European Court’s defense of the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s property rights, at least in one case, may extend to the 2,000 year old Christian community in Turkey at least a few more years of breathing space.

SOURCE:

Friday, September 12, 2008

Metropolitan Kirill to consecrate the first Russian church in Cuba

11 September 2008, 16:30

Moscow, September 11, Interfax - The Russian Orthodox Church of the Kazan Icon of Our Lady in Havana will be consecrated and opened on October 19.

"The construction of a church in the Cuban capital is completed. Experts from Russia are working in it, they are mantling cupolas, brazing the roof, gilding the central cupola. All crosses have already been gilded," deputy head of the Moscow Patriarchate Department for External Church Relations Bishop Mark of Yegoryevsk told Interfax-Religion.

The DECR head Metropolitan Kirill of Smolensk and Kaliningrad will chair the consecration ceremony.

Another expert from Russia will come to Havana to set iconostasis. The Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Laura painted icons for the church and the Likhachev Plant ZIL cast the cupolas.

The Bishop said that the Church of the Constantinople Patriarchate is situated near the Russian Church in Havana. "However, this church is several times smaller and in fact it is a chapel. While we have a grand cathedral that can house a thousand of people," Bishop Mark noted.

Cuban authorities and the Moscow Patriarchate representatives decided to build the church in 2004. Its foundation was laid the same year. Cuban government sponsored church foundation and walls. Russian Vorontsov Architectural Bureau participated in church design free of charge.

Cuban President Fidel Castro and Metropolitan of Smolensk and Kaliningrad Kirill at their meeting decided to build not just a church for Cuban Russian Orthodox believers, but a large cathedral, where Russian Orthodox priests would be trained not only for Cuba, but for the whole Caribbean Basin and Latin America.

Over five thousand Orthodox Russians live on the island including experts working in joint ventures, Russian embassy staff members and members of their families.

The Russian parish in Havana named after the Kazan Icon of Our Lady opened free courses of the Russian language taught by the Professor of Havana University Eduardo Sergio Sallas Casali, who studied in the USSR.

SOURCE:

US commission urges Turkey to respect church property ruling

Oxford, Ohio (ENI). The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom has called on the government of Turkey to implement immediately a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights to return or pay for confiscated land taken from the Orthodox church more than a decade ago.

SOURCE:

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Greek-American questions Turkey's EU admission

Nicholas Gage, renowned author and journalist, said that Turkey must take great strides, not "baby steps", to extend religious freedom and end harassment of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
__________________________________________________________
Tuesday, September 09, 2008 By Martin Barillas
_________________________________________________________________

Author and former New York Times correspondent Nicholas Gage wrote in the International Herald Tribune on September 8, 2008 that for Turkey to join the European Community “it must show that it is ready to take great strides in adopting a European outlook, not the baby steps it has taken until now.” Gage said in his opinion piece “Orthodox Christianity under threat” on IHT’s opinion page that Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and his Islamist party have “shown no inclination to extend even a modicum of religious freedom to the most revered Christian institution in Turkey - the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the spiritual center of 300 million Orthodox Christians throughout the world. As a result, Turkey's persecution of the Patriarchate looms as a major obstacle to its European aspirations, and rightly so.”

Gage denounced the harassment suffered by the ecumenical patriarch, Bartholomew I, at the hands of Turkish bureaucrats who “summon him to their offices to question and berate him about irrelevant issues, blocking his efforts to make repairs in the few buildings still under his control, and issuing veiled threats about what he says and does when he travels abroad.” Muslim chauvinists, according to Gage, demonstrate almost daily outside the walls of the Patriarchate and call for its ouster from Turkey despite its presence in the city once known as Constantinople since before the time of Mohammed.

Gage noted the Turks' blocking of Bartholomew ‘s efforts to make repairs in the few buildings still under his control, and issuing veiled threats about what he says and does when he travels abroad. The patriarch is also frequently burned in effigy by Islamist demonstrators. Historically, the Patriarchate held properties that rivaled that of the Vatican while successive Ottoman and modern Turkish governments have whittled away at them. Also, according to Gage, “Turkish governments have followed policies that deliberately belittle the patriarch, refusing to recognize his ecumenical status as the spiritual leader of a major religious faith but viewing him only as the head of the small Greek Orthodox community of Istanbul.”

Congressman Tom Lantos (D), long noted for his work on foreign affairs and human rights in the US House of Representatives, described the Patriarchate as “one of the world’s oldest and greatest treasures” and joined 42 of the 50 members of the Foreign Affairs Committee in a 2008 letter urging Turkey to recognize the ecumenical standing of the Patriarchate, return expropriated property, reopen its schools, and cease its interference in the process of selecting the patriarch as well as its continued insistence that he be a Turkish citizen. Noting that there are but 2,500 Orthodox Christians left in once was once the seat of Eastern Christianity, Lantos declared “It is the church, not the Turkish state, that should determine who becomes ecumenical patriarch.”

Gage noted that Turkey’s population now stands at 71 millions and its combined troop strength of 1.1 million men under arms surpasses any of Europe’s nations. He asked “If Turkey becomes a full member of the European Union, will it accommodate to Europe's liberal traditions or will it use its demographic and military prowess to bend Europe to its will? The EU has already ruled that Turkey must allow the ships of Cyprus, an EU member, to use Turkish ports, but Turkey has completely ignored the ruling despite its eagerness to join Europe. So the key question is whether Turkey is willing to adapt to Europe or wants only to join the EU on its own terms. It is crucial for Europe to know Turkey's real intentions before opening its doors to the country.”

Author Nicolas Gage has written several books about the Mafia in the United States, as well as an account of his mother in the acclaimed book “Eleni” which chronicled her death at the hands of Greek communists in the 1950s. He has also written a biography of Aristotle Onassis and Maria Callas.

SOURCE:

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Conflict between Greek monks flares up

Published: Sunday 31 August 2008 15:22 UTC
Last updated: Sunday 31 August 2008 15:22 UTC

A conflict between a groups of monks has flared up on the holy mountain of Athos in Greece, following years of dispute. A group of extremely orthodox monks is threatening to blow itself up according to the Greek media.

The group has isolated itself from the 19 other monasteries on Athos because it fiercely opposes dialogue with the Roman Catholic church. The other groups of monks think they should leave the mountain because of this. But the extremist monks say they will blow their monastery up with dynamite, petrol and gas bottles if they have to. There were skirmishes on Sunday, when another group of monks tried to enter the rebel monastery.

There were similar incidents 18 months ago on the eastern peninsula of Chalkidiki, in which seven monks were seriously injured.

SOURCE:

Monday, August 25, 2008

SEN. MENENDEZ FIGHTS TO ENSURE TURKISH GOVERNMENT RESPECTS RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCH'S ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE

SEN. MENENDEZ FIGHTS TO ENSURE TURKISH GOVERNMENT RESPECTS RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCH'S ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE

In seeking to join European Union, Turkey must adhere to certain criteria, including the guarantee of respect and protection for religious minorities

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has introduced legislation to urge the Government of Turkey to respect the rights and freedoms of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of the Orthodox Christian Church, in accordance with criteria necessary to join the European Union. The Ecumenical Patriarch is the leading figure in the Orthodox Church and has suffered from discriminatory treatment from the Turkish government.

"For a government to treat a revered religious institution and leader in such a discriminatory manner is an affront to human and religious rights and shows disrespect to the hundreds of millions of Orthodox Christians," said Senator Menendez. "There must be fairness and freedom when it comes to the Turkish government's treatment of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. As Turkey appeals to the European Union for membership, I would expect its treatment of the Ecumenical Patriarchate to be a prime topic that must be addressed."

Senator Menendez's resolution, which is co-sponsored by Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Joseph Biden (D-DE) and Benjamin Cardin (D-MA), urges the Government of Turkey to respect the rights and religious freedoms of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of the Orthodox Christian Church. It calls on the Turkish government to immediately:

• recognize the right to the title of ??Ecumenical Patriarch'';

• grant the Ecumenical Patriarch appropriate international recognition and ecclesiastic succession;

• grant the Ecumenical Patriarch the right to train clergy of all nationalities, not just Turkish nationals; and

• respect property rights and human rights of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

The Government of Turkey has sought membership in the European Union and maintains strong bilateral relations with the United States Government. The accession of Turkey to the European Union will depend on its adherence to the Copenhagen criteria that require candidate countries to have stable governmental institutions that guarantee human rights and that respect and protect minorities, including religious minorities such as Orthodox Christians.

SOURCE: