Wednesday, October 01, 2008
ROCOR urges the elderly not to scare youth away from Church
Moscow, September 30, Interfax – A leader of scout movement in the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia Archpriest Yaroslav Belikov recommends elderly parishioners who insult young people coming to the Church to think over spiritual education of their own grandchildren.
“When I see an old women reproaching youngsters, I always want to question them: why do you educate others’ children and grandchildren who have come to the Church? Where are your own grandchildren? Why didn’t they come to the church?” a cleric of the Church of Icon of Joy of All Who Sorrow in San Francisco and spiritual leader of the Kiev scout team Fr. Yaroslav told an Interfax-Religion correspondent.
According to the priest, new parishioners are lucky if they manage pass the candle shop and escape a remark about short sleeves, woman in trousers or a sign of cross improperly made. Fr. Yaroslav suggests treating these remarks philosophically: “There are little old ladies and there are small nettle.”
“If there are children playing, I always glad to see them. It means the Church has future,” the priest is convinced.
He suggested that the way to solve traditional conflict between “angry old ladies” and first comers is to make young people do something in the Church.
“Young parishioners should be sent to church vestibule to welcome people coming,” the scouts’ spiritual leader offers. Fr. Yaroslav believes that young doorkeepers can bridge priests and new people in church, who are embarrassed to come up to a priest and ask him their questions.
SOURCE:
Monday, September 15, 2008
Delegation of the Russian Church Abroad visit Orthodox Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia
After the divine service, Bishop Peter gave Archbishop Simeon a portion of the relics of St John of Shanghai and San Francisco for the Orthodox church in Brno. In his greeting, Protopriest Josef Feisak, the church’s Rector, remembered the late Metropolitan Laurus of blessed memory, who loved to visit the region, and expressed his pleasure at the concelebration held on this day, which became possible because of the restoration last year of the fullness of brotherly communion within the one Local Russian Orthodox Church. At the end, Fr Josef introduced the members of the delegation, and gave Bishop Peter a part of the holy relics of St Ludmila of Bohemia. Then, at the parish hall, the Rector hosted a luncheon in honor of Archbishop Simeon, Bishop Peter and the other guests.Bidding farewell to Archbishop Simeon and Fr Josef, Bishop Peter and those with him returned to Prague, where they visited with His Beatitude Metropolitan Krystof, the Primate of the Orthodox Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia, who joyfully welcomed them to dinner in his residence. His Grace Bishop Melety of Hotins, Vicar of the Chernovtsy and Bukovino Diocese was also in attendance.
Bishop Peter is being accompanied by Protopriest Serafim Gan, Priest Lubomir Kupec, Deacon Nicholas Olhovsky and Reader Eugene Hrihoriak.SOURCE:
Thursday, August 14, 2008
The Parishes of the Russian Church Abroad Pray For the End of Bloodshed in the Caucasus
_______________________________________________________________
Last Sunday, many parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia raised their prayers for the end of the conflict between the fraternal Orthodox peoples of Russia, South Ossetia and Georgia.
His Eminence Archbishop Mark of Berlin and Germany issued an ukase for the parishes of his diocese to pray for Orthodox Christians in the Caucasus and for the restoration of peace in the region.
On August 10, prayers for the increase of love and cessation of bloodshed were made during Divine Liturgy at the Cathedral of St John the Baptist in Washington, DC. Parish Rector Protopriest Victor Potapov called the conflict “a terrible, fratricidal tragedy provoked by the enemy of our salvation.” Immediately following a moleben, a pannikhida was performed for the memory of the innocent Orthodox Christian victims killed in the conflict in South Ossetia.
An appeal by His Holiness Patriarch Alexy II of Moscow and All Russia said “I am aware of the appeal to peace made by His Holiness Catholicos-Patriarch Iliya of All Georgia. I also make my ardent appeal to those who have gone blind with hatred: stop! Do not let more blood be shed, do not let today’s conflict be expanded many times over! Show common sense and virtue: sit at the negotiation table for talks with respect for the traditions, views and aspirations of both the Georgian and Ossetian peoples. The Russian Church is ready to unite efforts with the Georgian Church and help in achieving peace. May our God, Who ‘is not a God of disorder but of peace’ (1 Cor. 14:33), be our Helper in this endeavor. “
SOURCE:
READ THE PREVIOUS POST RELATED TO THIS STORY:
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Orthodox unity gives worshippers more options
The decision to unite the two branches of Russia’s Orthodox Church last year has changed the pattern of worshipping for many believers. More churches are now available and bilingual services are held in some places.
"We now are able to welcome guests from the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, so it enables unity among all orthodox Christians, not only the Russian branch of orthodox Christianity," says Father Zacchaeus, the dean of St. Catherine’s parish Church in central Moscow.
Father Zacchaeus grew up in the heaving metropolis of New York City, moving up through the ranks of the Orthodox Church of America before becoming its Representative to the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow.
Father Zacchaeus has told RT a 16th century orthodox church at the heart of old Moscow is a "sort of church equivalent of an embassy". In 1994, it was transferred to the U.S. Orthodox Church.
Bilingual services - in Church Slavonic and English - have been a tradition from the very start.
Despite the traditional Russian exterior the church fulfils a unique purpose. For English speaking orthodox Christians in Moscow it provides a taste of home. And for Russians, who now make up the majority of the congregation, it provides a window onto a more international brand of orthodoxy.
Though St. Catherine’s church is opened for orthodox Christians and religious services are being celebrated, the building is still being reconstructed to rebuild its past glory after 70 years of neglect during Soviet times.
The old rectory is now occupied by Russia’s federal security service, church wardens say.
SOURCE:
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Where are the Keys to the Kingdom?
The four-yearly Council of Bishops of the multinational and multilingual Russian Orthodox Church is now taking place in Moscow. It has been announced there that the Russian Orthodox Church now has 196 bishops, 30,544 clergy and 769 monasteries and convents. The number of churches is increasing by five per day, between 1,500 and 2,000 per year, and is now nearly 31,000, the same as the number of clergy.
It is notable that the present number of churches is almost exactly the same as the number of New Martyrs and Confessors, who have been canonised in the ever-growing list of Russian Orthodox saints of the twentieth century. This list continues to grow and eventually with further documentary research it is expected to extend to at least 100,000 catalogued saints and lives. Since, in an extraordinary way, the numbers in the list appear to run parallel to the number of parishes, there are those who hope to see the day when the Russian Church will be composed of at least 100,000 parishes, twice the number of 1917. It is notable that the number of monasteries and convents is already higher than that of 1917.
The theme of the 2008 Council is Church Unity. This is of particular significance, given that the two parts of the Russian Church, the Patriarchate and ROCOR reunited only last year, both abandoning politically-conditioned Cold War excesses. However, many dangers for unity still exist. These disintegrating trends threaten the literal and spiritual integrity of the Church and can be listed as follows:
Apart from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, two schismatic, semi-Orthodox groups also exist in the Ukraine. At present the Church and these two groups are being pressured by secular and nationalist politicians like Vladimir Yushchenko and provincial Galician politicians to fall into Uniatism. In this way, politicians and nationalists could construct and impose an Autocephalous Ukrainian Church, which would be Roman Catholic Ukrainian first and Orthodox last. Sadly there are also pressures from Rome, Warsaw and, even more sadly, from ‘Orthodox’ modernists in Istanbul, whose dream it is to take over the Ukraine as part of a worldwide ecclesiastical Empire of ‘Eastern papism’.
It may be that in the Ukraine Orthodox will yet have to witness with their blood for the sake of Russian Orthodox Church Unity. If so, we are ready.
As mentioned above, this tiny but ancient Patriarchate, which is less than 2,000 strong in Istanbul itself, has been interfering in Church life in the Ukraine. Sadly, it has interfered even more actively and created schisms elsewhere, in Estonia. France and England, thus souring its relations with the rest of the Orthodox world and putting itself on the fringes of the Orthodox world.
Its ecclesiastical imperialism, inspired by the State Department of the USA and masonic lodges (some would say that these are the same thing), is resisted by faithful and conscious Orthodox in all the Local Orthodox Churches, which outnumber it by far. One of the main seats of resistance is on the Holy Mountain of Athos, which is within the Constantinople jurisdiction. We pray that the Church of Constantinople will return to its former place in the mainstream of Orthodox life, throwing off political temptations and the fallacies of ecumenism and so isolationism within the family of Local Orthodox Churches.
Sadly, the Romanian Church has set up plans to take over the Church in the independent Republic of Moldova, which is a Metropolia of the multinational and multilingual Russian Orthodox Church. These plans would create two Churches on the same territory, an uncanonical situation (as in Estonia, where there is a tiny ‘Church’ under Constantinople, which has about 10% of the Estonian Orthodox population under it). Of course, if Moldova, which is basically a Romanian-speaking country, and its Church, which is basically a Romanian-speaking Church, wishes to give up its political independence and become part of Romania, it would be normal that the Metropolia there transfer its allegiance to the Romanian Church. But to set up two Churches on the same territory is unacceptable. Even more sadly, the Romanian Church has even threatened to set up parishes in the Ukraine, where Romanian-speaking parishes happily co-exist with Ukrainian speaking parishes under the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
We can only hope that the nationalist, political agenda of the new Romanian Patriarchate, at present also under pressure from the problems raised by its new, Uniat Archbishop Nicolae of the Banat and the Romanian government, which recently gave up its sovereignty to the EU, will cease. Then the previous excellent relations between the Russian and Romanian Churches can resume.
There is within Russia among the newly-baptised but still unChurched millions a tendency towards ‘Diomidism’, that is the nationalist xenophobia and isolationism of the Patriarchal Bishop Diomid of Chukotka. This tendency goes much further than some similar tendencies in the emigration. It even goes to the extremes of calling for the canonisation of Tsar Ivan the Threatening (often miscalled ‘the Terrible’ in English) and the layman Gregory Rasputin and refusing to pay income tax. Although both these figures were and are much slandered by Western and Westernised historians, no Churched Orthodox would think of them as saints. As for rejecting tax codes, we can only repeat the words of the Gospel: ‘Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s’.
By the grace of God, with time, patience and much more information, such people will become Churched. We suggest that they visit ROCOR parishes in the West, where we are certainly not isolated, but still hold the Faith. This may help them to come to a Churchly and balanced understanding of the real world. Of course, Metropolitan Hilarion’s uncompromising speech on ecumenism at the Bishops’ Council should already help them, as also those small numbers outside Russia who did not follow ROCOR’s reconciliation with the Patriarchate..
On the other hand, among the newly-baptised but still unChurched millions, there is also the opposite extreme of modernist Neo-Renovationism. Led by figures like Fr George Kochetkov in Moscow, those who are great admirers of the neo-Catholic Fr Alexander Men, and by old renovationist Orthodox in the West, such as Bishop Basil Osborn, Olivier Clement, Elisabeth Behr-Sigel and their now mainly deceased mentors from the Paris emigration clergy in Paris, the USA, Finland and elsewhere, they would like Russian Orthodoxy to merge with Protestantism and Uniatism.
By the grace of God, these individuals, now dying out, will eventually come to repentance and the realisation of the truth, understanding the Church and Her Church culture (‘Tserkovnost’). Repentance will bring with it not only spiritual realisation and understanding, but also the abandonment of both liberal secularism and equally secular conservative moralism. The Church is beyond all these secular fads. She lives in Tradition, in the Holy Spirit.
Finally, as in the Ukraine, there is the problem of autocephalism in the Diaspora, especially in the USA. Here, there is the OCA organisation, begotten during the Cold War like a premature baby and unrecognised by the majority of Local Churches. One quarter of its membership is now leaving it, to return to the now free Romanian Mother-Church and there are moves by some other OCA members to return to their now free Mother-Churches, whether Bulgarian, Albanian and above all Russian. This is the case especially in Alaska and to some extent in Canada. The example of ROCOR and its reconciliation with the Mother Russian Church is clearly behind this. That is why the reconciliation was so opposed by senior modernist elements in the OCA, who attempted to sabotage it, as they wish to remain outside canonically-recognised bodies. Eventually, they may join anti-Tradition Protestantised/ Americanised elements in groups like the Antiochian Archdiocese in North America. The same can also be said of the European Paris Exarchate under the Patriarchate of Constantinople, which is divided down the middle between Churchly elements who wish to return to the Russian Mother-Church with their pre-Revolutionary Church property, and renovationists, who wish to destroy the Russian Tradition and completely merge with anti-Tradition modernist elements inside the Patriarchate of Constantinople.
The above movement of autocephalism was brought about by placing nationality above Orthodoxy. Placing Ukrainianism, Americanism, French/Western intellectualism or any other sort of ethnophyletism, be it Russian (Bishop Diomid), Romanian or Greek, above the Holy Spirit is responsible for all these divisions. These divisions exist and can only continue to exist through the lack of spirituality and the absence of spiritual thinking of the majority. Therefore, their inherent problems can only be overcome by substantial numbers in these groups putting the Holy Spirit first. Only when the Holy Spirit comes first, will Orthodox Tradition, the Life of the Spirit, come first. Then the various forms of secularism found in such groups, whether tedious liberal modernism (common among renovationist pseudo-intellectuals) or tedious conservative moralism (common among fundamentalist Evangelicals) will come last.
The spiritual flatness and emptiness of so much of ‘Orthodox’ life reduces the Church to a mere ‘religion’, instead of Faith. It reduces the Church to mere institutions and bureaucracies, instead of a vibrant and dynamic soul-saving organism. Such spiritual emptiness and shallowness merely ‘preserves’ ethnic customs instead of living the life of the Spirit. Therefore, it is called on to die out. This is already happening, as the old generation who blocked spiritual progress for so long reach their sixties, seventies and eighties and die out.
The way ahead for Orthodoxy is in what I was privileged to see last week in the wonderful family atmosphere in the Church of the Nativity of Christ at Erie in Pennsylvania.
Faith. Respect. Tradition.
Those who put secular, ethnic and political ideologies first will lose the keys to the Kingdom. But those who put these values of Faith, Respect and Tradition first are those who will gain the keys to the Kingdom. Let us be warned and take this warning to our hearts.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Russian Church Abroad enjoys more rights than in Russia - the ROCOR first hierarch
25 June 2008, 17:53
Moscow, June 25, Interfax - First hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia Metropolitan Hilarion regrets that Church in Russia doesn't have enough rights, Interfax-Religion has reported.
"(ROCOR - IF) clerics are not subjected to conscription almost in all Western states. Many countries spread the same law on other church ranks starting from subdeacons. We believe the Russian Orthodox Church doesn't have enough rights in modern post-Soviet society," the metropolitan has reported to the Bishops' Council on Wednesday.
According to him, the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad has its own priests in the Armed Forces along with clerics of other confessions.
"Most Western countries permit our clerics to visit the imprisoned and take care of Orthodox believers in hospitals, universities and schools including regular religious education as a state recognized school subject," Metropolitan Hilarion said.
He doesn't consider it shameful "to use such fruit of democracy in the interests of the Church for the glory of God."
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
The Patriarch Alexy's address to Bishops’ Council of Russian Orthodox Church
Your Beatitude, Your Eminences and Graces, Fellow-archpastors beloved in the Lord – Participants in this Bishops’ Council of the Russian Orthodox Church!
By His mercy the Lord has again brought us together, giving us an opportunity to look back and survey the life of the Church for the last four years and to determine what we are to do in the future with the help of God.
It is especially gratifying to note that last year the Lord fulfilled one of our innermost aspirations – the restoration of unity and canonical communion with the Russian Church Abroad. I am very much delighted therefore to welcome His Eminence Metropolitan Hilarion, the First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, and her archpastors who will take part in the Bishops’ Council of the united Local Church for the first time since the signing of the Act of Canonical Communion last year.
Speaking about the life of the Church in the pre-council period, we can point out that the recent years were marked with further development of diocesan and parish life, construction of churches, social service and missionary work, as well as educational efforts and ecclesiastical cultivation of the Orthodox soil. Special attention was given to education of the younger generation, strengthening of the family, preservation of the spiritual heritage, Orthodox creative work and the Church’s dialogue with the state and society, i.e., workers in sciences, education and arts, and to building peace and harmony.
At the same time it should be realized that the modern secular conscience guided as it is by the ideals of consumer society – with its thirst for gratification of sometimes vile passions and instincts, its belief in the total power of money, its religion of material wealth and its efforts to cultivate itself for the cravings of sinful man, the lust of his eyes and the boasting of what he has and does (1 Jn. 2:16) – resists accepting the truth of Christ and rejects the Revelation of the Gospel. It opposes its secularized understanding of human ‘rights’ and ‘freedoms’ to the Christian teaching of personal freedom and dignity. This understanding however, justifying manifestations of human sinful nature and using the protection of liberal freedoms as its cover, is fraught with a danger of rupture with moral laws and gives violations of the gospel’s commandments an appearance of legality.
The Church should be ready to meet this challenge and to fulfill the words of Christ, Go ye therefore, and teach all nations... to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you (Mt. 28:19-20). This is why it is so important that the Church should preach addressing the world and all her faithful should seek the spirit of apostleship and be zealous in bearing witness to the Truth. This requires highly professional theological and cultural level of missionary, catechetical and educational programs. And the Church has accumulated an enormous human and intellectual potential to do this as the clergy and the laity, working in good cooperation, have done much with God’s help in recent years for the regeneration of Orthodoxy in our countries. But what remains the most important thing in the preaching of the Word of God are our faith, our personal devotion and our own works. It is this that makes us the salt of the earth (Mt. 5:13). It is this that makes us the light of the world (Mt. 5:14), the candle that, once alight, cannot be put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all (Mt. 5:15). Let us work then with assiduity, in one mind and peace (2 Cor. 13:11), trusting in the Divine grace, which heals that which is infirm and completes what is wanting.
We should remember and draw strength from the fact that the Church has always been able to cope with internal disorders and vacillations brought in by those who were not fully initiated and enlightened, who showed zeal of God, but not according to knowledge, who sometimes isolated themselves from the life of the Church whose Head is Christ. It is about these people who in their pride oppose themselves to the Mother Church and sow eschatological panic around them that already St. John said, They went out from us, but they were not of us (1 Jn. 2:19).
We hope that with the all-powerful help of God the actions of our Bishops’ Sacred Council will become a valuable contribution to our further work for building church life. I call upon you all, dear Brothers in the Lord, to take an active part in the work of the Council thus helping to make it a success for the glory of God and the benefit of our Holy Orthodox Church.
We are to work at this Council to give answers to the questions that time has posed for us today. These are such important topics as consolidation of church unity and opposition to pernicious divisions, human dignity in the context of the globalization and attempts to impose the secular understanding of human rights, development and adoption of a provision for ecclesiastical court and development of the informational work of the Church. All this should be reflected in the final documents of the Council.
Most Reverend Archpastors, have the same love, be of one accord, of one mind (Phil. 2:2). May we at this Council show our unity to the external world. Only being assembled with one accord (cf. Acts 15:25), we will be able to adopt several final documents which will benefit the Church and the people of God. The future of the Church and the moral climate in society will depend in many ways on the credibility of our pastoral word addressed to the millions-strong Orthodox flock.
We hope that the All-merciful Lord will give us all strength in our work ahead. May the spirit of the Lord shall rest upon us, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord (Is. 11:2).
I declare the 2008 Bishops’ Council open.
SOURCE:
READ THE PREVIOUS POST RELATED TO THIS STORY:
Russian patriarchs meet to forge stronger links

This year the Church is marking the 1020th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus - the old name for Russia. This year's Bishops' Council welcomed the highest ranking members from the Russian Orthodox Church outside Russia, for the first time in eighty years.
Foreign bishops to attend Moscow Assembly of Hierarchs first time

Twelve foreign bishops, led by Metropolitan Ilarion, have come for the assembly.
The main topic of the present Assembly is church unity. Hierarchs will also examine the draft of “Foundations of the teaching of the Russian Orthodox Church on dignity, freedom and human rights” and will discuss the church’s information policy. They will pass decisions on a structure of the church court, on religious worship of new saints, including those, earlier canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad.
“Under the new conditions of church unity, the live connection with Russia will consolidate our church life, and I’d like to hope that our experience will help Russia too,” Metropolitan Ilarion said.
The patriarch will perform a thanks-giving service at the Dormition Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin, and then a Solemn Act and a concert will be held at the State Kremlin Palace. A reception will be held in the Kremlin on that day.
Saturday, June 21, 2008
VOZNESENSKY PROSPEKT:THE SPIRITUAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OUTSIDE RUSSIA IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY
St John of Shanghai
Your Eminences, reverend fathers, dear brothers and sisters in Christ, I was originally invited here today to repeat to you the address that I made at the Fourth All-Diaspora Council in San Francisco in 2006. Although I will say again a part of what I said there, I do not wish to repeat it all. It is not only available on the Internet, but, above all, this happened two long years ago, before the great events in Moscow on Ascension Day 2007 under the leadership of our ever-memorable Metropolitan Laurus. What I would like to do is to talk about the renewed significance of our part of the One Russian Church since Ascension Day 2007.
For in Moscow, on Voznesenie, Ascension Day, 17 May 2007, the two parts of the Russian Church entered into canonical communion with one another. Thus, they overcame the secular, political forces that had divided them after the fateful, anti-Russian and anti-Orthodox insurrections of ninety years before in 1917. Like others here, I was an eyewitness of the historic events of 17 May 2007. Since then, we know that there have been many positive changes within the Russian Church. However, events since that day, when the whole Russian Church celebrated together the Ascension of our Lord, have also raised new questions.
2. The Twenty-First Century: Globalism
The twenty-first century is dominated by one great movement, that of globalism or globalization. This movement towards world unity is hostile to all local tradition, culture and religion, in other words, it is secular, opposed to the Church. As in Ancient Pagan Rome, beneath the ‘pluralism’ of the globalist movement there is concealed polytheism, the worship of many gods, and not the worship of the One Christian God.
Led by the prince of this world and those dark forces that worship him, the globalist movement of secular humanism is summed up in the phrase ‘The New World Order’. Devout Orthodox in all the Local Churches consider that the plan of secular globalization is to enthrone the prince of this world, the Master of the New World Order, in Jerusalem and that this will be followed by the end of the world.
Having rejected the Church, the Body of Christ, the contemporary world rejects the Person of Christ. Having rejected Christ the God-man, the contemporary world also rejects the human person. Thus, the homicidal ideologies of the 20th century, Communism and Fascism, which hated Christ and hated mankind, murdered by the tens of millions. No peoples suffered from both of them more than the Orthodox peoples.
Although the Church, and especially our Church, is global, She is not at all globalist. Unlike globalization, the authentic Christian Faith does not destroy local cultures. She baptises them, saving in them all that is best, all that is compatible with the Word of God. She rejects only what is incompatible with the Word of God. This is because the culture of the Church is Trinitarian, expressing Unity in Diversity, the Unity of Three Persons in One Essence. Unlike globalist culture, Church culture is universal and local, united and diverse.
Thus, firstly, when the Trinitarian Faith is lost, nations may become nationalist and racist, as we saw in the case of Nazi Germany. We can see this also with contemporary Islamic fanatics, for whom the ‘New World Disorder’ of terrorist jihad is merely a reaction to Western globalization. When the Trinitarian Faith is lost, national identities may altogether disappear, as in the contemporary world. In the words of Fr Justin of Chelije, a disciple of Metropolitan Antony, in 1939: ‘Without Orthodoxy, a nation is devoid of eternal worth’.
Thirdly, when the Trinitarian Faith is lost, monasticism fails. Roman Catholic monastic life in Western Europe and the United States seems to be dying out. The Orthodox world is also affected. We well know that one of the few bastions of Orthodox monasticism in the USA is Jordanville.
3. ROCOR: The Global Church
I am going to take you from Pennsylvania and 2008 to Paris, France and thirty years ago, to 1978. More exactly to a Communist suburb of Paris, where in the 1970s there lived a Russian Orthodox family. In that family, whom I know well, there was a fourteen-year old girl who attended the local school, where of course the teachers were Communist. During one lesson, a question was asked about the nationalities of the pupils present in class. Each gave their answer: French, Algerian, Portuguese, Tunisian, Italian, Senegalese, Spanish, Moroccan, until they came to the girl. When it came to her and the question of her nationality, she answered like the martyrs: ‘My nationality is Orthodox’.
And she was right. You see, our Church is multinational. How many nationalities are there in this hall, even among our episcopate? Our Church is multilingual. We speak different languages. In fact, an outside observer might wonder what we all have in common, where the unity in our global Church comes from. This multinational and multilingual character of our Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia is obvious. There is no greater example of this than he who reposed forty-two years ago, St John, St John of Shanghai, St John of San Francisco, St John the Wonderworker, whom we venerate as light in our darkness: Rejoice, thou whose love knew no bounds of land or race (Ikos 3 of his Akathist Hymn).
At the Second All-ROCOR Council in 1938, it was he who said: ‘It has been granted to Russians abroad to shine the light of Orthodoxy throughout the world, in order that other peoples, seeing their good works, might glorify our Father Who is in heaven, and in so doing Russians will acquire salvation’. Perhaps St John had in mind the words of the Apostle Luke: Therefore they that were scattered abroad went everywhere preaching the word (Acts 8, 4). In his Encyclical of 1953, Metropolitan Anastasius took up St John’s words, announcing: ‘God has allowed Orthodox to be scattered throughout the world in order to proclaim the true Orthodox Faith to all peoples and to prepare the Earth for the Second Coming of Christ’.
4. The First Meaning of Voznesensky Prospekt
I come now to the first part of my title, perhaps for some a mysterious part, ‘Voznesensky Prospekt’ What does it mean? First of all it means: ‘The Programme of the Ascension’, in other words, it refers to the new programme that we in the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia have had since Vosnesenie, Ascension Day, last year.
Our ‘Voznesensky Prospekt’, our new spiritual programme, is in the spiritual unity of the whole Russian Church, attested to by our canonical communion with one another, has put the role of ROCOR in a new light and given Her a new force. We are no longer a small and isolated part of the Russian Church, struggling against the ways of the world to witness to the purity of Holy Orthodoxy. Our witness is now strengthened, we are no longer a small and isolated part of the Church, but rather the forward but still independent part of the Church.
In ROCOR we are implanted worldwide, we know local conditions, we know local languages and mentalities, we know how we can, if we are faithful, resist the temptations and compromises of the Western world, because we have already done it. We are the Church of St John of Shanghai, we are the Church of Fr Seraphim Rose, we are the Church that has worked out an Orthodox attitude towards ecumenism. In this we are unlike those few old-fashioned individuals who are still to work through their difficulties and complexes regarding ecumenism and other modernist movements. We should recall that the voices of these extremists are countered by others, at the opposite extreme, for the vast Russian Church inside Russia is hardly monolithic.
In this, however, we are not alone, because the vast majority of faithful Russian Orthodox bishops, monastics, clergy and people inside Russia support us. These are all those who pleaded for the canonization of the New Martyrs and Confessors in the Year 2000. Yes, the people are the guardians of the Church. We are not clericalists, like Roman Catholics or Protestants who pay much attention to the personal opinions of one or two senior individuals. Yes, it is true that in Russia today there are still one or two signs of the Soviet winter of the past, but spring is here and it is all-conquering.
Yes, it is true that for the moment we have lost a few of our numbers, but, in the meantime, we have gained the people and faithful clergy of all Four Russias, Great, Little, White and Carpathian Russia. The territory of these Four Russias covers one seventh of the world. It stretches from the Polish and Slovak borders to the Pacific Ocean, a distance greater than that between Poland and California, including all Western Europe, the Atlantic Ocean and the breadth of the United States. Yes, look at it on a map, if you do not believe me. Today 75% of all Orthodox faithful worldwide are with us in ROCOR and we are with them.
When, nearly five years ago, the former Russian President, Vladimir Putin, first visited our Synod in New York, he remarked, as one of our hierarchs told me, that to him it seemed logical that all Russian Orthodox living outside Russia should be part of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia. I agree. But I am also a realist, through my own experiences of the realities of ROCOR life. I believe that it will require special qualities to gather together all the Russian Orthodox of the many nationalities and languages who live outside the Russias into one Church structure.
5. Warm Heartedness
First of all, we must not be sectarian, but must have warm hearts. This starts in our own parishes. If we cannot keep our own people in the saving fold of our Church, then we have no hope of preaching the Gospel to others. We do this through warm-heartedness. Orthodox know when a priest is not a ‘good shepherd’, when he is a hired servant, when he demands money for sacraments, when he is cold and calculating, when he is a brain without a heart. The faithful flee churches which resemble financial concerns and I have seen that. As the Apostle Paul wrote: For I seek not yours, but you (2 Cor 12, 14). As the ever-memorable Metropolitan Antony used to say: ‘The worst praise for a pastor is to say that he is a ‘good administrator’. Administration is not the main thing. The very first duty of the pastor is prayer’. It is better not to have gilded onion domes, if they merely cover a museum, a club, a business, and not the House of God.
When a priest is warm-hearted, when father serves from the heart, when he prays, when he is responsive, then people come to the services, to confession and communion, to talks, they phone him up and ask for advice, they consider him truly a ‘little father’, whatever his personal weaknesses. Then the parish works as a loving family, which is what it should be, a feeling of prayerfulness inhabits the church building and people love and adorn their church. This spirit fosters piety and zeal to help. People want to sing, they want to repent, and without repentance there is no salvation. And the salvation of souls is our aim. Did not St Seraphim of Sarov say: Save your soul and thousands will be saved around you?
Our churches should be warm-hearted oases of liturgical and sacramental life, of prayer and mutual help, in this alien, secularized, globalized world of the 21st century. They should be living Orthodox communities, where others are not rejected, as so often happens, but made welcome, places where the Word of God is incarnate. We cannot meet the challenges of the globalized world, if we do not have such parish bases, where all feel at home, where all belong.
6. Humility
The second virtue is humility, the opposite of triumphalism. Humility means being alive to witnessing to the faith in the world around us. The possibilities for this are all around us in this world. These possibilities are in inevitable contacts with other Orthodox, with the heterodox and Non-Christian world, they are in daily life, with the masses who do not believe in anything. This is external mission. And such mission is not done by fire and sword, as so often heterodox missionaries have done. They do not understand the Scriptures, which do not promise the earth to the proud, but on the contrary affirm: Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.
In other words, mission is done through ‘models of meekness’, through humility, as for example with St Herman of Alaska. A simple monk, not a priest, living among the pagan Aleuts, he converted them to Orthodoxy through his example of humility: Having your conduct honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers, they may by your good works, which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation (I Peter 2, 12).
Only by setting an example of humility, obtained through fulfilling the commandments, can we ever hope to be successful missionaries. We must practise what we preach. We have nothing to give, if we cannot first give an example of humility. Our great Abba, Metropolitan Antony, began his missionary service as Bishop of Ufa, among Muslims and Old Believers, then in Zhitomir, among Roman Catholics, Protestants and Jews.
In his missionary work among all these peoples, he always stressed the vital importance of personal example. He spoke to others, he was open to them, he wrote missionary conversations which expressed our viewpoints, he set an example of humility. And humility does not at all mean weakness, for God...giveth grace to the humble (I Peter 5, 5) and My strength is made perfect in weakness (2 Cor. 12, 9). And much more recently, we have had before us the personal example of our ever-memorable Metropolitan Laurus, probably the greatest example of humility most of us will ever see in our lives. True, he wrote and spoke little, but that was because he lived the faith.
7. Compassion
Finally, the third virtue necessary to us is compassion, which is opposed to narrow-minded nationalism. This attitude is our spiritual legacy, the theological understanding and leitmotif of Metropolitan Antony. It is the attitude of compassion - compassionate love. As the Apostle Paul wrote nearly two millennia ago: Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not love, 1 am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that 1 could remove mountains, and have not love, 1 am nothing. And though 1 bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though 1 give my body to be burned, and have not love, it profiteth me nothing (I Cor. 13, 1-3).
If we members of ROCOR have no love for others who have been deprived of compassion, then we are like the Gentiles. These are not my words, these are the words of our Lord Jesus Christ: If ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? Do not even the Gentiles so? (Matthew 5, 47). If only all in Russia would take these words to heart. If they did, then all those grievous divisions, created by Renovationist modernism, created by the Declaration of Metropolitan Sergius, created by nationalism, created by an arrogant intellectual contempt for the simple faithful, would not have taken place. Compassion does not in any way mean weakness, that we are indulgent to ideologies hostile to the Church. As every confessor knows, although we must hate the sin, we must love the sinner.
All of these values can be cultivated within ourselves through our adherence to the Russian Orthodox Tradition. We do not have to be a part of sin, we must not be a part of sin. Sin is our battlefield. The word sin sums up all the words and groups that are hostile to the Faith which we in the Russian Orthodox Church confess.
Do not be distracted and confused by all those groups and organizations that wish us Russian Orthodox ill. They are only puppets in the hands of those whose souls are shackled by sin and so mislead the simple into the delusions of spiritual blindness. We all have only one common enemy, that is satan. And he now operates through secularism, through the vast spiritual vacuum and so spiritual impurity, that is now in the world.
And I will now give a word of warning. Unity among virtually all the multinational and multilingual Russian Orthodox living outside Russia is possible through these values of warm-heartedness, humility and compassion. We in ROCOR are called to achieve this unity, ours is the responsibility. But if we do not take up this challenge, then history will brush us aside and others will take our place and attempt to fulfil the necessary historic mission in which we will have failed.
8. Conclusion: The Mystical Sense of Voznesensky Prospekt
I would like to conclude this talk by referring now to the other meaning of this title ‘Voznesensky Prospekt’. This title not only means the new programme that we have had since Ascension Day 2007. There is another and mystical meaning. I do not know if the members of the two Commissions of the Russian Church realised this when they determined that the celebration of our spiritual unity should take place a year ago on Voznesenie, Ascension Day, but here is a fact.
Exactly ninety years ago, in 1918, there was in Russia a town called Ekaterinburg. And in that town there was a wide street, a broad avenue, called ‘the Avenue of the Ascension’; in Russian, ‘Voznesensky Prospekt’. And on that Avenue there stood a house, called the Ipatiev House. And inside that house, in the basement, there took place a momentous event, an event of such mystical horror that it changed World history for the rest of the twentieth century and has scarred its soul for ever. World history did not change for ever with the beginning of the Great War in 1914, nor with the two anti-Russian and anti-Orthodox insurrections of 1917. It changed for ever on 4/17 July 1918, with the slaughter of the Imperial Family in the Ipatiev House on Vosnesensky Prospekt in Ekaterinburg. Thus, the dynasty that had begun in the Ipatiev Monastery some 300 years earlier in 1613 ended in the Ipatiev House.
But as Orthodox Christians we know that the blood of the Imperial Martyrs spilled on that day, together with the blood of hundreds of thousands of other faithful Russian Orthodox on other days, indeed, the blood of millions, is the seed of the Church. And Russia’s holy men and women know the same. Thus, the Russian Hieroschemamonk Athanasius of Karaoulia on Mt Athos (+ 1937), speaking of Russian emigres who had given up hope, said prophetically: Do they not want to see the Russia of Christ, which stands before us? And in 1939, in the darkest night of Stalin’s atrocities, the holy elder, St Seraphim of Vyritsa, prophesied exactly what is happening today:
Пройдет гроза над Русскою землею,Народу русскому Господь грехи простит.И Крест Святой Божественной красоюНад храмом Божиим вновь ярко заблестит.И звон колоколов всю нашу Русь СвятуюОт сна греховного к спасенью пробудит.Открыты будут вновь обители святые,И вера в Бога всех соединит.
Across the Russian land the storm shall wing,And the Lord forgive the Russian people’s sin.And on God’s Church in beauty all DivineThe Holy Cross once more shall brightly shine. And from sinful sleep shall bells awaken All our Holy Russia to salvation.Holy monasteries shall open anew,And faith in God shall make all one and true.
And much more recently, there was another righteous and saintly man, who all his life lived by the hope of the restoration of Holy Russia. This was our beloved Vladyka Lavr, who fell asleep at the end of 15 March, the day on which we commemorate the Sovereign Icon of the Mother of God. And having prayed to her that day, he awoke in Paradise, on the Feast of the Triumph of Orthodoxy, where he beheld his beloved Royal Martyrs, come from Voznesensky Prospekt, and he was greeted by them.
Her knew that from 1917 on, the Russian Church lived through Her Crucifixion. But in the last twenty years She has risen from the Tomb and we have seen Her Resurrection. One year ago we lived through Her Ascension, when She was united again. Now, together, we move on, in the united Russian Church, to Pentecost, the Day of the Holy Trinity, and the sending out of new Apostles all over the world, north and south, east and west.
What then is the spiritual significance of Russian Orthodoxy, both inside and outside Russia, in the twenty-first century? What is this Voznesensky Prospekt? I will tell you. Voznesensky Prospekt is the Great Avenue that goes up, that ascends, rising from the basements of the Earth to the heights of Heaven. You see, the path taken by the Royal Martyrs and by all those Russian Orthodox New Martyrs and Confessors with them, leads to Holiness, for the path of the Cross leads to Resurrection, the Final Victory. Не бойся, малое стадо! Fear not, little flock! Азъ есмь с вами и никтоже на вы! I am with you and none is against you! Симъ знамениемъ победиши! In This Sign, you will conquer!
Priest Andrew Phillips,
Erie,
Pennsylvania
6/19 June 2008
Holy Wonderworker Bessarion of Egypt
Friday, June 20, 2008
The Constantinople Patriarchate discredits Orthodoxy before non-Orthodox world, the Russian Church Abroad believes
Moscow, June 19, Interfax - The Russian Orthodox Church Abroad severely criticized the Constantinople Patriarchate.
"It seems to me that here (in relations with the Moscow Patriarchate - IF) Constantinople leads a kind of fight that is unhealthy and contradicts the spirit of Orthodoxy. They discredit Orthodoxy before non-Orthodox world. No one profits from it. They do it for their own reasons," Archbishop Mark of Berlin and Germany said in his interview published by the NG-Religii paper.
He believes that a Pan-Orthodox Congress should have discussed Constantinople's juridical claims.
"We have to clear out if Constantinople has any special rights in the Church, what are the bases for its claims to govern over the entire Orthodox diaspora and play the role of "the Eastern Pope" in Orthodox world," the foreign hierarch said.
He also called it "an outrage upon justice" that Constantinople decided to welcome under its jurisdiction former head of the Sourozh Diocese of the Moscow Patriarchate in Great Britain Bishop Basil (Osborne).
Commenting on actions of certain Constantinople representatives who back up Ukrainian schismatics, Archbishop Mark said that "even if one doesn't understand anything in church politics, it's easy to come to the conclusion: a race for power is underway."
The archbishop stated that the Church Abroad, both in Western Europe and America, lived in peace with Constantinople and expressed hope that this tendency would be preserved.
SOURCE:
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Orthodox Conference to offer services

KNOW BEFORE YOU GO
What: Orthodox Conference
Friday, June 13, 2008
Archbishop Demetrios of America welcomes His Eminence Metropolitan Hilarion
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:10:41 -0700
GREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERICA
8-10 East 79th St. New York, NY 10075-0106
Tel: (212) 570-3530 Fax: (212) 774-0215
Web: http://www.goarch.org
Email: communications@goarch.org
June 10, 2008
Contact: Stavros Papagermanos
Tel. 212-570-3556
ARCHBISHOP DEMETRIOS WELCOMES METROPOLITAN HILARION,
FIRST HIERARCH OF ROCOR
New York, NY -- On Monday June 9th, Archbishop Demetrios of America welcomed His Eminence Metropolitan Hilarion, the newly enthroned First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR) at the Archdiocese Headquarters in New York City. This meeting between the two Primates follows on a new relationship between the Churches occasioned by the reunification of ROCOR with the Moscow Patriarchate in May of 2007. Archbishop Demetrios had already sent a congratulatory letter to Metropolitan Hilarion after his election as First Hierarch (Primate) of ROCOR, which also invited him to the Archdiocese.
Metropolitan Hilarion was accompanied by the Very Rev. Protopriest Alexander Lebedeff, Secretary of Inter-Orthodox Relations. During the 90 minute meeting with the Archbishop, who is also the Chairman of the Standing Conference of the Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas (SCOBA), the discussions focused around the new reality of ROCOR in the Pan-Orthodox environment of America. Also present at the meeting were the Chancellor of the Archdiocese, Bishop Savas of Troas, Father Mark Arey, Director of Inter-Orthodox Relations and Archdeacon Pandeleimon Papadopoulos.
SOURCE:
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Procession to Christ the Savior Witnesses ‘Miracle’
10/06/2008On Sunday, a religious procession of several thousand people that began at the Kolomenskoye Museum-preserve proceeded to the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, having covered 16 kilometers in five hours.
As the procession approached, clouds of unusual shape, resembling a star's diverging rays, appeared in the sky above the cathedral. Many of the faithful, having learned about this phenomenon from one another, exited the cathedral in order to look at the "miracle," which several called "the shroud of the Virgin Mother."
The solemn procession through the streets and embankments of Moscow completed the spiritual program of eight processions called "Under the Star of the Virgin," which began May 17 of the last year and is dedicated to the re-uniting of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia with the Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church.
For several months eight processions bearing miracle-working icons and saints' relics have walked from various parts of the world to the capital of Russia.
Each procession symbolized one of the eight rays of the "star of the Virgin," and came together on June 8 at Christ the Savior, celebrating the 125th anniversary of the cathedral's first consecration.
More than 4,000 people took part in the final, united religious procession. In the Cathedral the pilgrims were met by the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, Alexis II.
In addition to religious processions and services, the international program of "Under the Star of the Virgin," included conferences and discussions, the setting up of holy crosses, and the laying of new churches.
The program promoted the consolidation of society and the Church and the strengthening of the spiritual unity of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.
The St. Andrew's Flag Fund considers it deeply symbolical that the program was completed precisely on June 8, as this is when the memorial day of the holy fathers of the First Council of Nicaea is celebrated.
SOURCE:
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Archbishop Hilarion becomes head of Russian Church abroad

Voting for his candidacy was held Monday at a conference of ROCOR’s Council of Bishops in New York.
His Beatitude Hilarion’s predecessor, Metropolitan Laurus died March 16 at the age of 81.
The document put an end to the split between the two branches of the Russian Church that divided them for almost eight decades.
During the metropolitan’s funeral in Jordanville, NY, the Most Reverend Hilarion said it is necessary to continue moving along the course the two Churches embarked on.
ROCOR’s Bylaws says its supreme hierarch has the title of the metropolitan and is elected by the Council of Bishops for life. Apart from chairing the conferences of the Council of Bishops and the Synod of Archpriests, the ruling metropolitan also takes care of the internal and external benefits of the Church.
ROCOR is governed by the Council of Archpriests that convenes annually and has the status of the supreme body for issuing edicts, as well as governance, adjudication and control over activities of the Church.
It handles all the affairs related to the matters of principle in what concerns nowadays schisms and false teachings and to legal defence of ROCOR’s interests in governmental institutes and other agencies of power.
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
Russian Orthodoxy Goes Global

Every Sunday morning, several dozen people, most of them Russians, drive from Johannesburg to Pretoria and from Pretoria to Johannesburg. They meet half way in Midrand, where several years ago the five-domed Russian Orthodox Church of St. Sergius was built amid the well-off South African suburbia. On big holidays the crowd grows to several hundred people, some of whom fly in from Cape Town, Durban and neighboring African countries.
According to Father Ioann Lapidus, the rector of St. Sergius, about 60 percent of his parishioners are people who had not been religious until they left the former Soviet Union, mostly in the 1980s and 1990s. “Now the nostalgia for the Motherland has brought them to church,” Lapidus said in a telephone interview. “The Russian Orthodox Church of St. Sergius is not only a place where they can pray in their native language, but also a center of gravitation for the entire Russian diaspora in South Africa, where people can talk in Russian and touch base with their roots.” Hence the parish activities, including a Sunday school with a Russian class and a club for young mothers.
Yet the church complex is meant predominantly as a spiritual home for the broader Russian community in South Africa, which Lapidus estimates to number about 6000 people. Some 20 mostly elderly people belong to the post-revolutionary and World War II waves of Russian emigration. The majority, however, left the Soviet Union after perestroika, and although small compared to Europe or the United States, the community constitutes the biggest Russian diaspora in sub-Saharan Africa at present. There are Russian doctors, physicists, professors, businessmen in trade, transportation, tourism and other fields. In 1998 they organized a parish, bought a land plot in Midrand, and with generous help from the Stroytransgaz pipeline construction giant and support from the Russian Foreign Ministry, built the most impressive new Moscow Patriarchate church outside the former Soviet Union.
Russia’s willingness to invest in a church and community center for its former countrymen thousands of miles away illustrates the post-Soviet reality both in Russian state-church relations and in the country’s attitude toward its diaspora. For most of the 20th century, Russia destroyed churches at home and sold them abroad. It persecuted or neglected its émigrés. Yet, in line with the more classic diasporas like Jews, Armenians or Greeks, Russian Orthodox Church communities around the world served as the focal points of émigré community life, and the only enduring institution capable of preserving the Russian identity in foreign environments. Some were in communion with the Moscow Patriarchate and others were bitterly opposed to it; some used magnificent churches built in European capitals and resorts by pre-revolutionary Russian royalty and aristocracy, while others cobbled new ones out of garages and residential buildings, rarely raising enough private funds to build a proper church.
While the Communist regime carried out the policy of eliminating and subjugating the Church, the émigré community, for whom the catastrophe of 1917 and the ensuing exile was a profound conversion experience, saw its mission in preserving and developing the great theological and cultural tradition of Russian Orthodoxy, not just to one day “return” it to Russia, but also to bring it to the far flung corners of the world.
Another, more liberal part, found inspiration in the so-called “Paris school” of Russian theology, which formed among émigré church intellectuals in Paris in the 1920s and 1930s. It sought development of Orthodox Christian theology either in a return to the Church Fathers or in a broad adaptation of contemporary Western Christian and secular scholarship. In the decades when hopes for the Soviet regime collapse were dimmed, this tradition also implied a localization of their Orthodoxy, including the translation of the liturgy into English, French and other languages, a shift to the Western calendar, and other synthesis of an Eastern Orthodox tradition with a Western identity. Today, followers of this tradition are mainly found in the Paris-based Exarchate of Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe, under the Ecumenical Patriarchate, and in the Orthodox Church in America (OCA).
Restoring lost unity
After 1988, the church life in Russia was liberalized, paving way to the revival of church life. Both of the major émigré schools of church thought gained influence in Russia and were accepted, in various degrees, by respectively traditionalist and modernist groups. In terms of organizing parish life with a need to preserve Russian Orthodox identity and bringing up children amidst increasingly diverse secular and consumerist societies, foreign experience with summer camps, charities, conferences and other non-liturgical activities has been in high demand in Russia across the ideological spectrum.
“In our foreign conditions the Church has always been the axis around which our life was built,” Metropolitan Laurus, the First Hierarch of the ROCOR, said in his address to the Moscow Patriarchate-sponsored World Council of the Russian People in late February. During the 10 day Moscow visit, he was awarded the “Compatriot of the Year” award by Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov and the St. Andrew Prize by the influential St. Andrew Foundation, led by one of President Vladimir Putin’s close associates, Russian railways head Vladimir Yakunin. The visit was meant to underscore the newly found unity of the two parts of the Russian Church. “The Church supported Russian charities, cultural, youth, sports and other organizations, created a network of Sunday schools and involved children in an active participation in church life as sacristans, readers and singers. The results of this work are obvious—the youth, which is close to the Church already in the fourth generation, have preserved their faith, their Russianness and their language,” said Metropolitan Laurus.
Holodny’s grandfather, Protopresbyter Alexander Kiselev, born in Russia but raised in independent Estonia, was a pastor to the anti-Soviet, Nazi-affiliated army of Gen. Andrei Vlasov. He founded the “Merciful Samaritan” house in post-World War II Munich—a combination of a church, school, clinic and dormitory, where first-wave Russian émigrés were helping desperate Russian DPs. When he moved to New York in the 1950s, Kiselev created the St. Seraphim Foundation, with a church and concert hall becoming a religious and cultural center for many Russian American intellectuals. A champion of unity between ROCOR and the Moscow Patriarchate, he died in Moscow in 2001, when his dream (fulfilled six years later) appeared unreal and his own family was divided along the lines of cooperation or continued opposition to the Moscow Patriarchate. Holodny’s father-in-law, Archpriest George Larin, runs one of the largest foreign Russian parishes and community centers in Nyack, NY. It is at his parish that one of the first conferences bringing together Moscow Patriarchate and ROCOR priests took place in 2004, following President Vladimir Putin’s meeting with ROCOR bishops in Nov. 2003 and the beginning of the rapprochement.
“The division inside the church emerged as a result of the deepest political schism of Russian society itself,” President Vladimir Putin said at the June ceremony. “Today, after decades of alienation, we can say that there were no winners in the church-political conflict. But everybody lost: both the Church and the believers, who had to live in an atmosphere of mutual distrust. Russian society at large lost. The revival of church unity is the main precondition for restoring the lost unity of the entire Russian realm, one of whose main spiritual foundations has always been the Orthodox faith.”
Ensuing tensions over Russian identity
Despite the significance of this act, it did not abolish all divisions in the Orthodox Churches of Russian tradition around the world, typical of Russian émigrés who have always been notorious for their infightings. A relatively large part of the ROCOR split from the Church over its unity with Moscow, saying that by signing the act, ROCOR lost is purity, having aligned itself with the Moscow Patriarchate which remains subservient to the state and maintains ecumenical relations with non-Orthodox Christians. The exact size of these groups is hard to establish. While the opponents of unity with Moscow cite the number of as much as 100 parishes, just under one third of all ROCOR parishes prior to June 2007, Holodny estimated the number as under 10 percent. The website of the largest split-away group, Provisional Supreme Church Authority of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, lists about 50 clergy and parishes mainly located in the former Soviet Union where groups had joined ROCOR over the last 20 years primarily out of their opposition to the official church. Holodny also said that some of those who split away are beginning to rethink their position, but refused to elaborate on whether anyone had actually returned.
Ironically enough, the Paris-based Exarchate of Parishes of Russian Tradition, having been closer to the Moscow Patriarchate in the recent decades than ROCOR and remaining in communion with Moscow through the Patriarch of Constantinople, is currently locked in a bitter dispute with the Moscow Patriarchate over what it sees as Moscow’s expansionist policies, including the ongoing legal battle over a landmark Russian church in Nice. Moscow claims that the church should be returned to the Russian state after the 99 year long lease.
Apart from the rivalry between the numerically largest Patriarchate of Moscow and the historically preeminent Patriarchate of Constantinople, both of whom claim jurisdiction over Russian diaspora, the conflict in Britain underscores the Moscow Patriarchate policy of stressing the Russian cultural identity over local integration in its dealings with the emigrants. It also explains why unity with the largely isolationist ROCOR was achieved, while relations with the largely integrationist Paris-based church worsened.
Photo: courtesy of St.Sergius Church


